GMAT RC: Eliminating Wrong Answers

GMAT Reading Comprehension - image by Magoosh
Learn tips for simplifying your approach to GMAT Reading Comprehension



Of course, on any GMAT question, eliminating wrong answers is always to our advantage.  There are myriad methods of eliminating answers in the Quant section: because of the constraints specified in the question, the answer must be negative, or greater than 7, or divisible by 5, or etc.  On Sentence Correction, one eliminates by identifying splits among the answer choices.  On CR, there are fewer clear cut rules for eliminating answers, and some students may feel there are essentially no clear cut rules or procedures for eliminating answers on RC.


Patterns among incorrect Reading Comprehension answer choices

Despite this perception, there are some discernible patterns that RC incorrect answer choices follow.  Learning these patterns and mastering them can be a huge boon on test day!


1) Emotional tone

The tone of virtually everything on the GMAT verbal section is balanced, measured, and reserved.  This is the tone of most professional business writing.  Think, for example, if a business executive described a colleague or competitor in flamboyantly emotional language: that executive would probably be risking a law suit!  Even strong praise and strong criticism has to be couched in subtle, understated language.  Everything in the RC passages will reflect this balanced tone, and all the correct answers will have this balanced tone.  Any answer choice that has any emotional charge to it must be incorrect.  Examples of answer choices with this flaw:

“that the sponsor of the new bill despises people who exploit the poor.”

“that the factory workers’ union was elated by the new retirement package.”

Improve your GMAT score with Magoosh.

Without even knowing the passage or the question, we can tell these would be wrong answers.  The words “despises” and “elated” connote very strong emotions, and this is far too strong for the tone of GMAT RC.


2) Unrealistic scope

Philosophers and religions throughout history have regularly made universal claims about life, the universe, and everything.  Even natural scientist make universal claims within their subject area: “every electron in the universe has a spin of 1/2.”  The claims in the business world are far more modest.  The modern global economy is an extremely complicated system: no one thing is ever the only “cause” of a vast system of changes.  No economic rule holds in every case without exception.  The claims in economic discussion tend to avoid universal or universalizing claims.  Therefore, any answer choice which extends an argument to an unreasonable extent is quite likely to be an incorrect answer.  Examples:

“as the price of an item rises, the demand always decreases.”

“the President’s policy is responsible for all the economic problems of American cities.”

“every employee in the factory is opposed to management’s surveillance plan.”


Again, we need neither the passage nor the specific question to recognize these as incorrect choices.  The first seems to invoke a law of economics, but fails to account for its exceptions.  The second discusses something that account for “all the economic problems” — any modern post-industrial economy is far too complex for any one factor to account for “all the economic problems” of anything.  The third one is particularly interesting: it’s easy to imagine that a surveillance plan would be unpopular, that perhaps the majority of employees didn’t like it, but we always have to be careful when talking about “everyone.”  There are often folks who are completely clueless: eight months after the surveillance plan has been in operation, they still may be totally unaware of it.  There are also folks who are deliberately contrary, and enjoy disagreeing with everyone else.  Unless the passage indicated explicitly that 100% of the employees, every last one, responded in the same way, it’s a vastly unwarranted assumption that all the members of any group would agree unanimously on anything.


3) Very fancy language

Sometimes, the GMAT will try to intimate you with fancy language.  One pattern of incorrect choice involves high-level vocabulary and specialized terminology.  The answer will not be correct, but it will be a potent distractor, because folks think: “gee, I don’t even know what those words mean, but they certainly sound clever!  That must be right.”  This one is less universal, but when you see an answer choice loaded with difficult words, that should certainly send up red flags.  For example:

“the author inveighed against the hermeneutical underpinnings of the CEO’s assertion.”

Regardless of the passage, regardless of the question, I can guarantee this choice would never be a possible correct answer in any conceivable GMAT RC context.  But, gosh, doesn’t it sound fancy?  That is precisely what will tempt many GMAT takers to choose it.  The word “inveigh” is not only difficult but also fails according to the first criterion discussed: it is emotionally too strong.  The word “hermeneutical” is incredibly obscure, relevant in only certain abstruse academic fields, and does not pertain to anything discussed in the modern business world.   If you see an answer choice loaded with words you don’t know, in your mind, mark it tentatively as wrong, and return to it only if every other answer choice fails miserably.


4) New idea

This can be a tricky one.  Sometimes, a RC answer choice will mention or discuss something that wasn’t mentioned at all in the text.  This new idea will be clearly related, in some way, to what was discussed, but never explicitly mentioned.  For example, suppose the passage is about the difficulties related to the Civil War that Lincoln faced during his presidency.  Then, a brand new idea, not discussed in the passage, could concern: the challenges of any other wartime president, or the challenges Lincoln faced concerning domestic issues only tangentially related to the war.  The new idea has to be “close” to what was discussed in the passage — that’s what makes it tempting — but technically, it was never explicitly mentioned.

Ideally, you will read the RC passage thoroughly once, summarizing in brief notes, and thereby be familiar enough with the content to recognize immediately such an answer.  Assuming you are in the habit of reading thorough the first time, then if you read an answer it triggers a “Gee, I don’t remember that being mentioned” feeling, don’t doubt yourself and immediately accuse yourself of overlooking it.  Rather, know this is a pattern for incorrect answer choices.

Improve your GMAT score with Magoosh.


5) Doesn’t answer the question

This can be the most devious type of wrong answer.  This will be a statement that is 100% consistent with the passage, completely supported by the author’s discussion.   The trouble is: it doesn’t actually answer the question posed.

Suppose, once again, the passage is about the difficulties related to the Civil War that Lincoln faced during his presidency.  Suppose the passage explicitly discusses General Burnside‘s inadequacy as a Union general, for example, at the Battle of Fredericksburg.  Now, if the individual question concerns, say, the challenges resulting from disagreements among members of Lincoln’s cabinet concerning matters of the war, then an answer choice along the lines of “Lincoln was highly critical of General Burnside’s performance at the Battle of Fredericksburg.”  Well, that issue was certainly explicitly discussed in the passage, it is a completely supported assertion, but it has absolutely nothing to do with disagreements among Lincoln’s cabinet.  That is a hypothetical example of this very tricky type of GMAT RC wrong answer.



The more familiar you become with these patterns among the incorrect answer choices, the more efficient you will be in dispatching one GMAT RC question after another.

Ready to get an awesome GMAT score? Start here.

Most Popular Resources

17 Responses to GMAT RC: Eliminating Wrong Answers

  1. Akshat September 8, 2018 at 9:17 am #

    Does practicing GMAT RCs can help me through GRE’s RC as well?

    • Magoosh Test Prep Expert
      Magoosh Test Prep Expert September 16, 2018 at 1:39 pm #

      Hi Akshat,

      Yes! The RC questions are basically identical on both the GRE and GMAT, so using GMAT questions will definitely help you on the GRE 🙂

  2. Rishabh Pincha May 25, 2018 at 12:37 am #

    Hey Mike,
    Regarding the first point can you mention more words which indicate strong emotions and how can I analyze which words indicate strong emotions


    • Magoosh Test Prep Expert
      Magoosh Test Prep Expert May 25, 2018 at 7:37 am #

      Hi Rishabh,

      Thanks for reaching out to Magoosh! This is one reason why it’s important to have a strong vocabulary for GMAT RC. You should be able to recognize the emotional tone of words and feel comfortable reading complex vocabulary in sentences and passages. We have a few blog posts that will help you to develop these skills:
      GMAT Vocab: Words to the Wise
      GMAT Reading List (one of the best ways to improve in RC and build your vocabulary is through reading!)

  3. Richa Chandra August 1, 2016 at 2:41 am #

    In CR, there are fewer clear-cut rules for eliminating answers. Do you have blog for such elimination rules/tricks

  4. aviral July 19, 2016 at 4:44 pm #

    Thanks Mike..although i am a student of magoosh premium package but reading your blogs is always an eye opener. Those little information i get through your blogs makes me more adaptive not only for GMAT style questions but also for GMAT style wrong answer choices..and i hope this differentiate magoosh from other gmat prep modules.

  5. Richa July 14, 2015 at 8:24 pm #


    I searched, but could not find any articles written by you on tone: Negative, Positive and Neutral tone analysis or something similar. If there is one, can you send me the link? Thank you!

    • Mike MᶜGarry
      Mike McGarry July 15, 2015 at 7:34 pm #

      Dear Richa,
      I’m happy to respond. 🙂 No, I don’t believe I have devoted a whole article to the issue of tone. The best thing I can recommend, which will help in all RC skills, is to read regularly. Read business news and magazines: the Economist magazine is very good. The tone in the Economist matches the correct tone on the GMAT RC: objective, balanced, thoughtful, reserved. No extreme emotions. That’s the tone for GMAT RC.
      Does this make sense?
      Mike 🙂

  6. Samarpit Arya August 12, 2013 at 2:27 am #

    Great compilation. I always have difficulty in RC section. I mean, my accuracy is around 40-50% in it. I will try to implement these things and see if it helps or not. But no doubt, its a great article. If possible, can you please tell me about any strategy that i should follow whenever i see any Reading Comprehension question?

    Thanks in advance


    • Mike MᶜGarry
      Mike August 12, 2013 at 10:21 am #

      Thank you for your kind words. I would suggest reading through the other RC articles on this blog. If you sign up for a Magoosh membership, we have a number of high quality RC questions, each one with its own video explanation, for accelerated learning.
      Mike 🙂

  7. Abraham July 15, 2013 at 3:27 am #

    Hi Mike,

    Thanks so much for the very concise yet clear article on RC possible-wrong-answer groups! This is super helpful.

    Have a good day!

    • Mike MᶜGarry
      Mike July 15, 2013 at 9:42 am #

      You are quite welcome. Best of luck to you!
      Mike 🙂

  8. trois_couleurs July 8, 2013 at 4:03 am #

    Awesome article! clear explanation as always. Thank you!

    • Mike MᶜGarry
      Mike July 8, 2013 at 12:16 pm #

      Thank you for your kind words. Best of luck to you.
      Mike 🙂

  9. Deepesh October 5, 2012 at 5:57 am #

    Thanks Mike…..!!! Wonderful insight for solving the RC section…really valuable and well reasoned..


    • Mike MᶜGarry
      Mike October 5, 2012 at 11:16 am #

      Thank you for your kind words. I’m glad you found it helpful.
      Mike 🙂

Magoosh blog comment policy: To create the best experience for our readers, we will only approve comments that are relevant to the article, general enough to be helpful to other students, concise, and well-written! 😄 Due to the high volume of comments across all of our blogs, we cannot promise that all comments will receive responses from our instructors.

We highly encourage students to help each other out and respond to other students' comments if you can!

If you are a Premium Magoosh student and would like more personalized service from our instructors, you can use the Help tab on the Magoosh dashboard. Thanks!

Leave a Reply