Among other things, this post is a case study of an OG DS question:
OG 12th Edition, Data Sufficiency Practice Problem #23
Here is the problem that appears in the OG:
23) If p_{1} and p_{2} are the populations and r_{1} and r_{2} the number of representatives of District 1 and District 2 respectively, the ratio of the population to the number of representatives is greater for which of the following districts?
(1) p_{1}>p_{2}
(2) r_{2}>r_{1}
- (A) Statement 1 alone is sufficient but statement 2 alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.
- (B) Statement 2 alone is sufficient but statement 1 alone is not sufficient to answer the question asked.
- (C) Both statements 1 and 2 together are sufficient to answer the question but neither statement is sufficient alone.
- (D) Each statement alone is sufficient to answer the question.
- (E) Statements 1 and 2 are not sufficient to answer the question asked and additional data is needed to answer the statements.
Below, I’ll show the solution to this.
Basic Fraction Facts
Here are two very important fraction rules.
1) When the numerator increases and the denominator stays the same, the fraction as a whole increases. When the numerator decreases and the denominator stays the same, the fraction as a whole decreases.
2) When the denominator increases and the numerator stays the same, the fraction as a whole decreases. When the denominator decreases and the numerator stays the same, the fraction as a whole increases.
Those, as they are stated, are always true 100% of the time.
Not As Simple
If both the numerator and denominator change at the same time, then things are trickier. See the table below, which assumes that both numerator and denominator are positive.
Numerator | Denominator | Fraction as a Whole |
increases | increases | (all bets are off) |
increases | decreases | increases |
decreases | increases | decreases |
decreases | decreases | (all bets are off) |
In the first case, for example, whether the fraction increases depends on how much the numerator increases, and how much the denominator increases. For example:
1/3 -> 2/5 both numerator & denominator increase, and fraction increases
1/3 -> 2/7 both numerator & denominator increase, and fraction decreases
(Both of those can be easily seen from the fact that 1/3 = 2/6, so be increasing or decreasing the denominator of 2/6, we can create bigger or smaller fractions.)
Back to the OG DS Problems
Now, we can tackle the DS problem above. We are comparing fractions of population over number of representative, p/r.
Statement #1: The numerator of the first fraction is larger. If we knew the denominators were staying the same or getting smaller, we could deduce that the fraction overall is getting bigger. Unfortunately, we have no information about how the denominators compare. Statement #1, by itself is insufficient.
Statement #2: As always in GMAT DS question, we have to forget about everything in Statement #1 and focus only on what Statement #2 says. — We know the second fraction has a lager denominator. We have no information now about the numerators. Statement #2, by itself is insufficient.
Statements #1 & #2 combined: Now, we know that when we go from the first fraction to the second fraction,
the numerator decreases and the denominator increases. This is row three of the table above: the fraction as a whole decrease, so District #2 has a lower population to representative ration than District 1. Answer = C
Here’s another GMAT Data Sufficiency Question on ratios, to practice: http://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/995
If r2 > r1, how do we know that…
“…the second fraction has a small dominator.”
Wouldn’t the second fraction be a large denominator because r2 > r1???
Is the result not “…the numerator decreases and the denominator increases”??
Dear JD,
Yes, that was a typo. I just made the change. Thank for pointing it out!
Mike 🙂
Mike,
With regard to your two fraction rules above, don’t you have to consider the case when the number is negative?
For instance, if we have the fraction -2/3, then increasing the numerator by 1 makes the fraction larger (-1/3), and increasing the denominator by 1 also makes the fraction larger (-2/4).
Something to consider, hope I am on the right track.
Rohan
Dear Rohan,
I edited the post, to specify that the chart only applied to positive numbers. If you have to compare two negative fractions, I would say compare their absolute values following these rules, and then see what happens when you make them negative.
Does all this make sense?
Mike 🙂
Also without doing this reasoning (useful but a little cumbersome) we can use algebra: our statement can be write as follow: P1/r2>P2/r2 —–> p1r2>p2r1 then this is yes or no ??
clearly the two statement alone are insufficient because alternatively we have no information of the other variable p or r. But if we combine the two statements and sum them, and having the same direction > we obtain the same rephrasing above. Clearly sufficient 🙂 C is the answer
Domenico: Yes, you’re perfectly correct. Clearly, you have facility with algebra. For those us who are “fluent” in the language of algebra, like you and me, there are a variety of ways of attacking this problems. Yours is just as good as mine. I included the long explanation here, hoping to make things clear to folks who are not quite as “fluent” in algebra. Thank you for sharing: another perspective is always helpful!
Mike 🙂