**Learn to master this often confusing topic! **

## Why Fractions Are Hard

Of all the math topics that raise dread, fear, anxiety, and confusion, few do so as consistently and as potently as do fractions. I have my own personal theory why fractions are hard. The trouble is: think about when you learned fractions — maybe the third, fourth, and/or fifth grades. That’s when fractions are usually taught, but there are two problems with that. First of all, that’s before the tsunami of puberty hits you and virtually obliterated all previously held logical connections in your head. More importantly, fractions, like many other topics in math, involve sophisticated patterns, but in the fourth grade, no one is capable of abstraction, so instead you are just taught to reproduce patterns mechanically, and relying on mechanical repetition has severe limitations: similarly looking things become conflated, and when you get confused, you basically don’t know what to do. Many people simply give up at that point.

The solution is re-approach those mechanical procedures, but with *understanding*. When you understand why you do each thing, then (a) you can remember it much better, and (b) in a moment of confusion you can figure out what to do. I will lead you through fractions from the ground up.

## What is a Fraction?

A fraction is a way of showing division. The fraction 2/7 means the number you get when you divide 2 by 7. The top of a fraction is called the **numerator**, and the bottom of a fraction is called the **denominator**.

The fraction 2/7 also means the following. Imagine dividing something whole into seven equal parts—one of those parts is 1/7 of the whole, so 2/7 = 2*(1/7) is two of those parts. Probably this diagram will call up dim memories from your prepubescent mathematical experiences.

That, visually, represents 2/7. Two vital things to remember about 2/7—one is that 2/7 is two of the thing called 1/7—that is, 2/7 = 2*(1/7), and second is this visual perspective that is always vital.

Notice that if you have the fractions 4/14 or 10/35, they both cancel down to 2/7. **Cancelling is division**. That’s a big idea—thus, when you have 4/20, and you cancel (i.e. divide) the 4’s in the numerator and the denominator, they don’t simply “go away” (a fourth-grade mechanical way of thinking), but rather what’s left in the numerator is 4 ÷ 4 = 1, and we get 4/20 = 1/5.

## Adding and Subtracting Fractions

First of all, let’s address the common mistake: when you add fractions, you can’t simply add across in the numerator and denominator (this is the mistake people make when they mechanically perform the rule for multiplication with addition instead!)

You may dimly remember that **you only can add and subtract fractions when you have a common denominator**. That’s true, but why is that true? Believe it or not, the basis of this fact is none other than the Distributive Law, a(b + c) = ab + ac. For example, if I add 3x and 5x, I get 3x + 5x = 8x — according to the Distributive Law, I can add two terms of the same thing, BUT if I want to add 3x + 5y, I can’t simplify that any further and must keep it as 3x + 5y. If you add two terms of the same underlying thing, you can combine the terms, but if you are adding proverbial apples and oranges, you can’t combine. Well, 3/11 + 5/11 is really just 3*(1/11) + 5*(1/11) — so, by the Distributive Law, you are allowed to add two terms of the same thing: 3/11 + 5/11 = 8/11

When the denominators are not the same — 3/8 + 1/6 — then you can’t add them as is, but you can take advantage of a sleek mathematical trick. We know that any number over itself, say 3/3, equals 1, and you can always multiply by 1 and not change the value of something. Therefore, I could multiply 3/8 by some a/a, and multiply 1/6 by some other b/b, and both would retain the same value. I want to multiply each so that I find the Least Common Denominator (LCD), which here is 24. Thus

The same thing works for subtraction:

## Multiplying Fractions

This is the easiest of all fractions rules. To multiply fractions, multiply across in the numerators and denominators.

What’s a little tricky about multiply is what you can cancel. If you are multiply two fractions, of course you can cancel any numerator with its own denominator, but you can also cancel one numerator with another denominator. Sometimes, that is called “cross-cancelling”, which I think is a 100% useless term that reinforces fourth-grade mechanical thinking. I think it’s much more effective to remember: when you multiply fractions, **you can cancel any numerator with any denominator**. Here’s a horrendous multiplication problem that simplifies elegantly with the liberal use of cancelling.

## Dividing Fractions

First of all, multiplying by 1/3 is the same as dividing by 3. That’s just the fundamental definition of fraction as division. This also means, dividing by 1/3 is the same as multiplying by 3. This pattern suggests, correctly, that dividing by a fraction simply means multiplying by its reciprocal:

Notice, as always, cancel *before* you multiply. Dividing a fraction by a number follows the same pattern:

Notice, this is really the same idea as: dividing by 3 means the same thin as multiplying by 1/3. Also, again, notice we cancel *before* we multiply.

## Proportions

Another word for a fraction is a **ratio**: ratios and fractions are exactly the same thing. A proportion is when you have two ratios, two fractions, set equal to each other. For example,

One legitimate move is to **cross-multiply**, although doing so here would violate the ultra-strategic dictum: cancel *before* you multiply. And it’s precisely this issue, what can you cancel and what can’t cancel in a proportion, that causes endless confusion. Let’s look at the general proportion a/b = c/d.

First of all, as always, you can cancel any numerator with its own denominator — you can cancel common factors in a & b, or in c & d. Furthermore, a proportion, by its very nature, is an equation, and you can always multiply or divide both sides of an equation by the same thing. This means: you can cancel common factors in both numerators (a & c) or in both denominators (b & d). The following diagrams summarize all the legitimate directions of cancellation in a proportion.

The following are highly tempting but complete illegal ways to cancel in proportions:

The trouble is, folks mechanically memorize the cancelling pattern for multiplying fractions — or even worse, they learn an utterly useless term like “cross-cancelling” — and then they mechanically apply that pattern when there’s an equal sign between the two fractions instead of a multiplication sign. This is a major mistake, and any time a proportion appears on the GMAT, the test-maker is expecting a large flock of test-takers to fall into this trap.

Let’s solve the proportion we wrote above, with proper cancelling:

Notice, in that last step, to isolate x, all we had to do was multiply both sides by 3. Cross-multiplying, while always legal in a proportion, often is a waste of time that simply adds extra steps.

## Practice Questions

I hope this refresher has clear up some fractions concepts for you. The best way to cement a new mathematical understand: practice, practice, practice!

1) http://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/124

2) http://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/812

3) http://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/62

#### Special Note:

To find out where fractions sit in the “big picture” of GMAT Quant, and what other Quant concepts you should study, check out our post entitled:

What Kind of Math is on the GMAT? Breakdown of Quant Concepts by Frequency

Just wanted some clarification on a practice problem on the “Eliminating fractions” lesson. Towards the ending of the video with the last practice problem you had the expression:

( (x^2/7) – (10x/7) + 3 ) / ( (x/6) – (1/2) )

I took the following steps:

multiplied both numerator and denominator by 42 because that is the LCM of 7, 7,6, & 2.

after doing so and multiplying I ended up with:

6x^2 – 60 + 126 / 7x -21

The numerator of that fraction presented me the chance to use GCF factoring and the denominator portion I noticed that I would be able to divide by 7

So I ended up with:

6(x^2 – 10 + 21) / x-3

The top denominator is still able to be simplified by finding values of a sum of -10 & 21.

I then ended up with:

6(x-7)(x-3) / (x-3)

I could then cancel out like terms (x-3)

and I finally ended up with:

6(x-7)

In your video you ended up with

6/7(x-7). I was curious to know where I went wrong, and how you came about your answer.

In your explanation you showed that instead of multiplying by 42 you decided to multiple 6*7 on the numerator and then 7*6 at the denominator. Why is that?

Hi Daniel,

Since you’re a Premium student, I forwarded this question on to our team of test prep experts. You should get a reply soon to your email!

Hello Mike ! Thanks for awesome explanation. I understand this concept fairly well however i got stuck on the logic of a problem and can’t seem to figure it out

If we have an a fraction a*3/5a why can’t we cancel the two a’s which would result in an answer of 3/4a because as i understand it 5a means 5a’s added together, so why can’t we cancel one of these 5 a’s with the a before the multiplication sign and get 3/4a as the answer?.

Hi Arsalan!

a*3 / 5*a is the same as (3/5) * (a/a). If we subtract the numerator and the denominator to give us: 3/4a, this wouldn’t result in the same answer.

When we multiply the top and the bottom of a fraction by the same number (a/a), we’ll get a fraction that is

equivalentto the first one. For example, let’s say a = 2.(3/5) * (2/2) = 6/10 = 3/5

If we subtracted, we’d get:

3a/5a = 3/4a = 3/(4*2) = 3/8

Which is not correct. Does that help? 🙂 If not, feel free to reply.

This post is helping me so much. I was beating myself up for making the exact mistake you describe at the end of the post, and this helps me to understand a) I’m not alone and I’m not “dumb” for thinking like that; b) how not to do it and what to do instead. I’m doing the magoosh 6 month math for GRE plan. Thank you, Mike!

Hi Mary Beth,

You’re definitely not dumb! We’re so glad to know that you found this post helpful, too. 🙂

Mike I always get a good chuckle from your videos and your posts. I loved your reference to “tsunami before puberty”. That was funny! Anyhow, I was one of those students who memorized all the formulas and did okay in math. Now as an adult learner I find it difficult to distinguish which fraction is larger and which fraction is smaller. I did review your video on the fractions which have the same denominator and or numerator but what about fractions that have different denominators and different numerators. Do you have a blog post on this topic? Or perhaps Kevin could do a topic on fractions for Tuesdays Tips?

Thanks again you are all very entertaining educators!

Dear Marie,

You are quite welcome. We appreciate your kind words! 🙂

I’ll say a couple things on the topic of comparing fractions that differ in both numerator & denominator. First of all, many many times on the GMAT, when it

lookslike this case, it’s really a much simpler case in hiding. For example, suppose we had to compare the size of, say, 58/61 and 128/131. Looks like different numerators & denominators, right? Well, we could re-write them easily:58/61 = 1 – 3/61

128/131 = 1 – 3/131

You see, (3/61) and (3/131) are easier to compare: the second is clearly smaller. Well, if we subtract something smaller from 1, we are left with something bigger, so 128/131 must be the bigger of the two. As is often the case on the GMAT, it’s not that there are many more “rules” to know, but one has to be more creative, more insightful, about thinking about the same rules.

Having said that, here is another blog you may find helpful, a blog that discusses another “rule”:

https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-shortcut-adding-to-the-numerator-and-denominator/

Does all this make sense?

Mike 🙂

This post was excellent in that it promotes an understanding of fractions through its content instead of merely listing the various rules for problems involving fractions. This is the stuff you don’t get from the textbooks in school!

Scott,

I’m glad you found it helpful. Best of luck to you.

Mike 🙂

Thank you 🙂

You are quite welcome.

Mike 🙂