**Learn the powerful shortcuts through these problems!**

## Practice Questions

Before reading this post, try these three related practice questions.

1) Is a positive?

Statement #1: > a

Statement #2:> a

2) Is a positive?

Statement #1: > a

Statement #2:

3) Is a positive?

Statement #1:

Statement #2:

I will give answers and full explanations at the end of this post.

## Definitions

When we write **exponent**; 2 is the **base**, the number that gets raised to the exponent; 16 is the **power**, the result of the “raising to an exponent” process; and this process itself is called **exponentiation**. You can read more about the Laws of Exponents here: http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/exponent-properties-on-the-gmat/. One thing that will help you immensely, especially on GMAT Data Sufficiency, are the patterns of raising different kinds of bases to powers.

## Simple Patterns

(a) When you raise a base of 1 to any exponent, the power equals 1. (b) When you raise any base (*) to an exponent of 0, the power equals 1. (c) When you raise a base of zero to any exponent (*), the power equals 0.

Those two stars indicate an exception in a Zen-like paradoxical case. If

When we throw in a negative sign, things become a little trickier. A base of –1 to any even integer exponent equals 1. A base of –1 to any odd integer exponent equals –1. What happens when we raise –1 to non-integer powers is also well beyond GMAT math, so you don’t need to worry about that. The odd/even exponent pattern, though, is very important.

In general, a negative base to an even integer exponents results in a positive power. A negative exponent to an odd integer exponents results in a negative power. We will see this played out below, in the four cases.

## Case 1: base greater than one

Let look at an example in this category, base = 2.

When we raise a base greater than one to positive integer exponents, the powers just get bigger and bigger (that increase is called “exponential growth”). When we raise a base greater than one to negative integer exponents, the powers are positive fractions less than one that get smaller and smaller, closer and closer to zero as the absolute value of the negative exponent increases.

## Case 2: positive base less than one

Let look at an example in this category, base = 1/2.

When we raise a positive base less than one to positive integer exponents, the powers are positive fractions less than one that get smaller and smaller, closer and closer to zero as the exponent increases. When we raise a positive base less than one to negative integer exponents, the powers are just bigger and bigger positive numbers, all greater than one.

If the fraction is, like 1/2, the reciprocal of an integer, then negative integer exponents produce positive integer powers, but if the fraction is not the reciprocal of an integer, like 2/3, then negative integer exponents will produce fractions —- 3/2, 9/4, 27/8 — that are all greater than one and increasing in value as the absolute value of the negative exponent increase.

## Case 3: negative base less than negative one

In other words, these are negative numbers whose absolute value is greater than one. Let look at an example in this category, base = –2.

As the exponent increase through positive integers, the absolute value of the powers increases, but as discussed above, the sign flip-flops: positive for even exponents, negative for odd exponents. Each succeeding power is further from zero, but on the opposite side of the number line from the previous power.

As the exponent moves through the negative integers, the absolute value gets smaller, closer and closer to zero, but again, positive for even exponents, negative for odd exponents. Each succeeding power is closer to zero, but on the opposite side of the number line from the previous power. Notice: in this cases, all the negative exponents produce powers that are greater than the original base.

## Case 4: negative base between negative one and zero

In other words, these are negative fractions, with an absolute value smaller than one. Let’s look at an example in this category, base = –1/2.

Now, as the positive integer exponents get larger and larger, the absolute value of the power continually gets smaller, closer and closer to zero, but again, positive for even exponents, negative for odd exponents. NOTICE: every positive integer exponent greater than one produces a power that is greater than the base: that much is true in both Case I and Case IV.

For negative integer exponents, the absolute values increase, getting further and further from zero, and signs flip-flop, positive for even exponents, negative for odd exponents. Even negative exponents product powers greater than the base, and odd negative exponents produce powers less than the base.

## Summary

Those four cases involve a lot of detail, and if this is your first time exploring these ideas in a while, just remember the power of plugging in numerical examples to figure out each case. It’s a start to know simply that there are different cases: that alone might lead you to see different choices you can plug in to test, say, a DS question.

If you struggled with those three DS questions at the beginning, this would be an excellent time to revisit them before peeking at the solutions below.

## Practice Problem Solutions

I will solve these in terms of the four cases discussed in this blog.

1) Statement #1: This statement is true in Cases I, III, and IV. That’s not enough to determine whether the base a is positive. This statement is insufficient.

Statement #2: This statement is true in Cases I and IV. That’s not enough to determine whether the base a is positive. This statement is insufficient.

Combined: both statements are true of numbers in Case I, and both statements are true of numbers in Case IV. The former are positive, and the later are negative, so we cannot determine the sign of the base. Even combined, these statements are insufficient. Answer = **E**

2) Statement #1: This statement is true in Cases I, III, and IV. That’s not enough to determine whether the base a is positive. This statement is insufficient.

Statement #2: This statement is true in Cases II and III. That’s not enough to determine whether the base a is positive. This statement is insufficient.

Combined: only numbers is Case III satisfy both of these statements. Combined, it means we must be in Case III, where the bases are negative. Thus, we have a definitive answer to the prompt question. This is sufficient to answer the prompt. Answer = **C**

3) Statement #1: This statement is true in Cases II only. Numbers is Case II are always positive, so this statement is sufficient to answer the prompt.

Statement #2: This statement is true in Cases II and III. That’s not enough to determine whether the base a is positive. This statement is insufficient.

Answer = **A**

Dear Mike,

Can you help me understand the following:

Q1. Case IV states that higher powers yield smaller results and alternate + and – signs. I don’t see how it is true for statement 2 in this case.

Q2 and Q3. For the same reason given above, Shouldn’t case IV also be true for statement 2 of questions 2 and 3.

Hi Lionel 🙂

Good questions!

Q1. Case IV states that higher powers yield smaller results and alternate + and – signs. I don’t see how it is true for statement 2 in this case.In the first question, statement 2 reads: a^5 > a. In Case IV, in which we have a negative number between 0 and -1, the magnitude of the higher power will be less than the magnitude of the lower power. In the problem, then, |a^5| < |a| in this situation. Now, let's consider the sign. In Case 4, the number raised to the power of 1 is negative. Here, then, a is negative or a 0 > a

Q2 and Q3. For the same reason given above, Shouldn’t case IV also be true for statement 2 of questions 2 and 3.Statement 2 in Q2 and Q3 reads: a^5 0 > a.

Hope this helps 🙂

Mike,

I’m not sure I understand.

In Question 3, Statement #1 gives Case I (positive whole #) is NOT true but Case II (Positive frac) IS true.

Since both Cases I and II are positive numbers, how can we definitely say that Statement #1 is enough on its own? It doesn’t make sense to me…

Thanks

Dear SK,

I’m happy to respond. 🙂 My friend, the logic of DS is very tricky, and it takes time to understand all its subtleties. The prompt question is “Is

apositive?” This a yes/no about the identity of some unknown valuea. It doesn’t necessarily mean thatahas to be all positive numbers. It might be that the specific unknown value ofais in Case I or in Case II, we don’t know. We just have to know, whatever the identity ofa, whether it is to the right of zero on the number line.Statement #1 would be false in all cases except in Case II. This statement means that whatever value

ahas, it must be in Case II. Therefore, we know without a shadow of a doubt thatais positive. It does NOT mean thatacould beeverypositive number: that is NOT what the question is asking. Instead,ais a very specific value, and we want to know: is this specific value positive. This statement tells us that it is. Again, this statement is actually a little stronger than sufficient: it not only allows us to give a definitive answer to the prompt question, but it also locates a in a very specific piece of real estate on the number line, the Case II situation. This is actually beyond just sufficient, but for the logic of the DS question, that doesn’t matter. We gave a definitive answer to the prompt, so this statement issufficient.Now, start from scratch again. We have no idea what the value of

ais. Statement #2 allows for multiple cases, either Case II or Case III. According to this statement, a could be positive, but we don’t know. Because we are left in a wishy-washy position with respect to the prompt question, this statement isnot sufficient.Remember never to assume that the answer to the prompt question is “

yes.” Sometimes it is definitively yes, sometimes it is definitively no, and sometimes we can’t answer it. Never treat the prompt question as an assumption that you are bringing to the statements. Also, when the prompt question is something such as “Isapositive?”, we are NOT asking whetheracould beanypositive number on the face of the earth. Instead,ais a variable with a very specific value, a specific location somewhere on the number line, and we are simply trying to determine whether it is at a positive location, a location to the right of zero.Does all this make sense?

Mike 🙂

Dear Mike. wonderful explanation from. I just need to cover a point I always miss. is a positive ? does it mean in all cases in all positive numbers I mean some case satisfy this in one positive but the other positive number does not. like question # 3 statement 1 positive base less than 1 satisfied the question but positive base greater than 1 does not satisfy the question answer. I am sorry if I can not express my point.

pretty thanks

Dear Hatem,

I think I understand what you are asking. When a DS question asks “is a positive?”, it is asking: in all possible cases, in all possible ways of thinking about it, does

aabsolutely have to be a positive number? Given the constraints, are they so complete that even God Himself could not makeaequal a non-positive number according to the constraints given? We could only answer “yes” to the question “is a positive?” if it is 100% certain thatais positive, and absolutely impossible for it to take a non-positive number in any case.If I give the constraint that

a > 5, then it is absolutely true thatais positive, because it is absolutely impossible for a number to be greater than 5 but not positive. If I give the constraint,a > -5, then we absolutely cannot give a “yes” answer to the question “is a positive?”, because althoughamay be positive, it is possible for it to be positive, but it is also possible forato be zero or any number between zero and -5. We are not interested in “maybes.” We are not interested in “could be’s” We are interested only in iron-clad 100% certain information, and we don’t have that, we dont’ have sufficiency in the DS sense.Does all this make sense?

Mike 🙂

Very helpful post. Cheers

I’m glad you found it helpful. Best of luck to you.

Mike 🙂

Mike, just wanted to say that this is a pretty useful post for developing a grid by which to test exponents.

Mine is: Pos Whole, Pos Frac, Neg Whole, Neg Frac. 🙂

Wouldn’t have been able to pin this down this simply without your post…

Dear Avinash: Thank you for your kind words. Best of luck to you, and let us know if you have any further questions.

Mike 🙂