Sarah Bradstreet

The 9 APUSH Historical Thinking Skills

APUSH historical thinking skills

The AP U.S. History course and exam expect students to be master several key skills that enable them to effectively study, understand, and interpret the past. At least one of these nine APUSH historical thinking skills is tested on every single question on the exam. So just what are these nine essential skills you’re expected to master and demonstrate? Read on to find out more.

1. Analyzing Evidence: Content and Sourcing

The first of the nine APUSH historical thinking skills deals with how well you can analyze primary sources. To demonstrate this skill, you should be able to examine a primary source and identify:

  • the author’s purpose and point of view
  • the intended audience
  • the historical context

2. Interpretation

This skill deals with analyzing secondary sources — those in which a historian is interpreting the past. To demonstrate this skill, you should be able to examine a secondary source and describe:

  • the author’s argument
  • how well the author supports the argument with evidence
  • how it relates to other historical interpretations

3. Comparison

This skill deals with making historical connections by comparing and contrasting events, societies, or perspectives. To demonstrate this skill, you should be able to:

  • compare the points of view found in multiple primary and/or secondary sources
  • find the similarities and differences between events, people, societies, and processes throughout history
  • make comparisons across different time periods and geographic areas

4. Contextualization

Contextualization involves the ability to put something in its proper historical context—understanding an event or document in relation to what else was happening at the same time, in the same area, or within the same long-term process. To demonstrate this skill, you should be able to:

  • place events or documents within the broader context of time and place
  • understand how an event relates to what else was going on locally, regionally, nationally, or globally
  • draw conclusions about an event or perspective based on its relation to the broader historical context

5. Synthesis

Synthesis is bringing multiple elements together by making connections between different time periods, events, people, cultures, locations, and perspectives. To demonstrate this skill, you should be able to:

  • make connections between various historical issues across time periods and locations
  • make connections between different historical themes

6. Causation

Causation is a chronological reasoning skill. It involves understanding cause-and-effect relationships throughout history. To demonstrate this skill, you should be able to:

  • identify long- and short-term causes of historical events
  • evaluate the relative significance of multiple causes of a historical event

7. Patterns of Continuity and Change Over Time

This skill asks you to look for patterns in the way that events unfold across time and place. To demonstrate this skill, you should be able to:

  • identify patterns of continuity (how things have stayed the same) and change throughout history
  • describe the importance of these patterns
  • explain how these patterns relate to a broader historical context

8. Periodization

Periodization involves understanding how and why historians organize history into periods the way that they do. To demonstrate this skill, you should be able to:

  • explain how historical events are grouped into periods
  • identify turning points in history
  • analyze different models of periodization

9. Argumentation

The last one of the APUSH historical thinking skills centers on the ability to make and support an argument about historical events and processes. This skill comes in especially handy on the APUSH essay questions. To demonstrate this skill, you should be able to:

  • construct an argument concerning historical events or processes using a clear thesis
  • develop your argument and support it with relevant evidence
  • evaluate the quality of evidence, including how well the evidence relates to or supports a given argument
About Sarah Bradstreet

Sarah is an educator and writer with a Master’s degree in education from Syracuse University who has helped students succeed on standardized tests since 2008. She loves reading, theater, and chasing around her two kids.


Leave a Reply

Magoosh blog comment policy: To create the best experience for our readers, we will approve and respond to comments that are relevant to the article, general enough to be helpful to other students, concise, and well-written! :) If your comment was not approved, it likely did not adhere to these guidelines. If you are a Premium Magoosh student and would like more personalized service, you can use the Help tab on the Magoosh dashboard. Thanks!


Share
Tweet
Share
Pin