{"id":13954,"date":"2026-03-09T10:26:39","date_gmt":"2026-03-09T17:26:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/?p=13954"},"modified":"2026-03-09T10:26:39","modified_gmt":"2026-03-09T17:26:39","slug":"toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/","title":{"rendered":"TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Sample Responses"},"content":{"rendered":"<style>\n  @media (max-width: 768px) {\n    .table-responsive {\n      display: block;\n      width: calc(100vw - 50px);\n      max-width: calc(100vw - 50px);\n      overflow-x: auto;\n      -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch;\n      margin-left: auto;\n      margin-right: auto;\n    }\n    .table-responsive table {\n      min-width: 500px;\n    }\n  }\n  .sample-response {\n    border-left: 4px solid #4D2079;\n    background: #f7f5fa;\n    padding: 1.2em 1.5em;\n    margin: 1em 0 1.5em 0;\n    border-radius: 6px;\n    font-family: Georgia, serif;\n    line-height: 1.7;\n  }\n  .tooltip-highlight {\n    position: relative;\n    cursor: help;\n    border-bottom: 2px dotted;\n  }\n  .tooltip-highlight.good {\n    background-color: rgba(76, 175, 80, 0.15);\n    border-bottom-color: #4CAF50;\n  }\n  .tooltip-highlight.improve {\n    background-color: rgba(255, 152, 0, 0.15);\n    border-bottom-color: #FF9800;\n  }\n  .tooltip-highlight .tooltip-text {\n    visibility: hidden;\n    opacity: 0;\n    position: absolute;\n    bottom: 125%;\n    left: 50%;\n    transform: translateX(-50%);\n    background-color: #333;\n    color: #fff;\n    padding: 8px 12px;\n    border-radius: 6px;\n    font-size: 0.85em;\n    font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, \"Segoe UI\", Roboto, sans-serif;\n    line-height: 1.4;\n    width: 280px;\n    max-width: 90vw;\n    z-index: 100;\n    transition: opacity 0.2s;\n    box-shadow: 0 2px 8px rgba(0,0,0,0.2);\n  }\n  .tooltip-highlight .tooltip-text::after {\n    content: \"\";\n    position: absolute;\n    top: 100%;\n    left: 50%;\n    margin-left: -5px;\n    border-width: 5px;\n    border-style: solid;\n    border-color: #333 transparent transparent transparent;\n  }\n  .tooltip-highlight:hover .tooltip-text,\n  .tooltip-highlight:focus .tooltip-text {\n    visibility: visible;\n    opacity: 1;\n  }\n  .tooltip-instruction {\n    font-size: 0.85em;\n    color: #888;\n    font-style: italic;\n    margin-bottom: 0.5em;\n  }\n  @media (max-width: 768px) {\n    .tooltip-highlight .tooltip-text {\n      position: fixed;\n      bottom: auto;\n      top: 50%;\n      left: 50%;\n      transform: translate(-50%, -50%);\n      width: 85vw;\n    }\n    .tooltip-highlight .tooltip-text::after {\n      display: none;\n    }\n  }\n<\/style>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/files\/2026\/03\/AcademicDiscussionResponses-1.jpg\" alt=\"Person writing a TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion response\" width=\"1200\" height=\"600\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-13956\" srcset=\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/files\/2026\/03\/AcademicDiscussionResponses-1.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/files\/2026\/03\/AcademicDiscussionResponses-1-300x150.jpg 300w, https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/files\/2026\/03\/AcademicDiscussionResponses-1-600x300.jpg 600w, https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/files\/2026\/03\/AcademicDiscussionResponses-1-768x384.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1200px) 100vw, 1200px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>What does a high-scoring TOEFL Academic Discussion response actually look like? And what separates a Score 4 from a Score 3?<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ets.org\/pdfs\/toefl\/writing-rubrics.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ETS rubric<\/a> talks about &#8220;relevant and well-elaborated explanations&#8221; and &#8220;an accumulation of errors in sentence structure&#8221; &mdash; but what do those phrases actually mean in a real discussion post? That&#8217;s hard to picture until you see it. In this guide, we&#8217;ll walk through a sample response at every score level &mdash; from a <strong>Score 5<\/strong> down to a <strong>Score 0<\/strong> &mdash; all answering the same prompt. For each one, we&#8217;ll explain what earned it that score and what sets it apart from the levels around it.<\/p>\n<p>By the end, you&#8217;ll have a concrete sense of what ETS rewards, what it penalizes, and where your own writing likely fits on the scale.<\/p>\n<div class=\"toc\">\n<p style=\"color: #4D2079; font-size:larger\"><strong>Table of Contents<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#why-study\">Why Study Scored TOEFL Academic Discussion Responses?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#the-prompt\">The Prompt<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#score-5\">Score 5: A Fully Successful Response<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#score-4\">Score 4: A Generally Successful Response<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#score-3\">Score 3: A Partially Successful Response<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#score-2\">Score 2: A Mostly Unsuccessful Response<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#score-1\">Score 1: An Unsuccessful Response<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#score-0\">Score 0: No Scorable Response<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#takeaways\">Key Takeaways<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#faq\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#whats-next\">What&#8217;s Next?<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style=\"color: #4D2079;\" id=\"why-study\">Why Study Scored TOEFL Academic Discussion Responses?<\/h2>\n<p>You can memorize the rubric top to bottom, but until you&#8217;ve seen what &#8220;relevant and well-elaborated&#8221; actually looks like next to &#8220;poorly elaborated or only partially relevant,&#8221; the descriptions stay abstract. Scored samples make the rubric <strong>tangible<\/strong>. When you can read a response and think, &#8220;That&#8217;s a 3&mdash;the opinion is there but it only engages one classmate and the support is thin,&#8221; you&#8217;re developing the same critical eye you need to strengthen your own writing.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s why that matters:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>You learn to self-assess.<\/strong> After you write a practice response, you can hold it up against these samples and honestly gauge where you land. Closer to a 4 or a 3? That comparison tells you exactly what to work on next.<\/li>\n<li><strong>You see what actually separates score levels.<\/strong> The gap between a 3 and a 4 isn&#8217;t just about grammar&mdash;it&#8217;s about how deeply you engage with your classmates&#8217; ideas and how specifically you support your own. These samples make those differences visible.<\/li>\n<li><strong>You complement AI feedback.<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/toefl.magoosh.com\/plans\">A Magoosh TOEFL Premium plan<\/a> gives you unlimited AI-powered feedback on your writing, which is great for targeted practice. But training yourself to spot strengths and weaknesses on your own&mdash;without waiting for external feedback&mdash;makes you a more independent writer. The two skills reinforce each other.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote style=\"border-left: 4px solid #4d2079; background: #F9FAFB; padding: 1em 1.2em; margin: 1em 0; border-radius: 6px; box-shadow: 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,0.05);\">\n<p><strong>Pro tip:<\/strong> Before you read the commentary below, try writing your own response to this prompt first. Then come back and compare what you wrote against the scored examples. Ask yourself: which one does mine most resemble? That single exercise can teach you more than re-reading the rubric ever will.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2 style=\"color: #4D2079;\" id=\"the-prompt\">The Prompt<\/h2>\n<p>All six responses below are written for the same prompt. Here it is:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"border-left: 4px solid #ddd; background: #f9f9f9; padding: 1em 1.2em; margin: 1em 0; border-radius: 6px;\">\n<p>Your professor, Dr. Moreno, is teaching a class on sports economics. Write a post responding to the professor&#8217;s question.<\/p>\n<p>In your response, you should do the following.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Express and support your opinion.<\/li>\n<li>Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>An effective response will contain at least 100 words.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><strong>Dr. Moreno<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ve been discussing the economics of college athletics. In many universities, student athletes generate significant revenue through ticket sales, merchandise, and broadcasting deals. Some argue that college athletes should receive financial compensation beyond their scholarships, since they contribute substantially to their universities&#8217; income. Others believe that a scholarship is sufficient compensation and that paying athletes would undermine the amateur nature of college sports. What is your opinion?<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><strong>Lena<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I think college athletes deserve to be paid. They spend countless hours training and competing, often at the expense of their academic and social lives. Meanwhile, their universities earn millions from their efforts. A scholarship covers tuition, but it doesn&#8217;t account for the time and physical demands these athletes face. Fair compensation would acknowledge their true contribution.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p><strong>Sam<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t think college athletes should be paid beyond their scholarships. A full scholarship is already a significant benefit that many students would love to have. Paying athletes could create inequalities between sports and take away from the team spirit and educational mission that college athletics is supposed to represent.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>This is a <strong>debate-style prompt<\/strong>&mdash;two classmates take opposite sides, and your job is to contribute your own opinion while engaging with both of them. There are no bullet points to check off like in Write an Email. Instead, the task asks you to express and support your opinion and make a meaningful contribution to the discussion in your own words.<\/p>\n<p>Now let&#8217;s see how six different writers handled it.<\/p>\n<p><!-- ==================== SCORE 5 ==================== --><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"color: #4D2079;\" id=\"score-5\">Score 5: A Fully Successful Response<\/h2>\n<p class=\"tooltip-instruction\">Hover over the highlighted text to see specific feedback.<\/p>\n<div class=\"sample-response\">\n<p>I agree with Lena that college athletes should be compensated beyond their scholarships. As she points out, these students dedicate enormous amounts of time to training and competitons, and their efforts directly generate revenue for their universities. <span class=\"tooltip-highlight good\" tabindex=\"0\">What I would add is that most athletes cannot hold regular part-time jobs because of their demanding schedules.<span class=\"tooltip-text\">This is a new idea that neither Lena nor Sam raised. Adding something original to the discussion is what separates a strong response from one that just repeats others&#8217; points.<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"tooltip-highlight good\" tabindex=\"0\">A football player at a major university, for example, might spend 40 or more hours per week on practice, games, travel, and team meetings &mdash; that is essentially a full-time job on top of their coursework<span class=\"tooltip-text\">A specific, concrete example that makes the argument real. This kind of detail is what pushes elaboration from adequate to strong.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"tooltip-highlight good\" tabindex=\"0\">While I understand Sam&#8217;s concern that paying athletes could create inequality between sports, I think the current system is already unequal.<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Directly acknowledges Sam&#8217;s argument and then counters it. This shows genuine engagement with the opposing view, not just a surface-level mention.<\/span><\/span> Athletes in high-revenue sports like football and basketball bring in millions, yet they recieve the same scholarship as athletes in smaller programs. <span class=\"tooltip-highlight good\" tabindex=\"0\">A fair compensation model would acknowledge that difference rather than ignore it.<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Strong closing sentence that ties the argument together with a clear contrast.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #C5168C;\">Why this is a Score 5<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Elaboration and relevance.<\/strong> The writer picks a clear side and backs it up with substance. Both classmates are brought into the discussion by name: Lena&#8217;s point about time and effort is paraphrased and extended, and Sam&#8217;s concern about inequality is acknowledged head-on and then countered with a specific argument. What really elevates this response is the new idea &mdash; athletes can&#8217;t hold regular part-time jobs because of their schedules. Neither Lena nor Sam raised that point. The football player example (40+ hours per week across practice, games, travel, and meetings) grounds the argument in something concrete. Every sentence pushes the discussion forward rather than repeating what&#8217;s already been said.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Syntax and vocabulary.<\/strong> The sentences do different jobs and are built differently. One acknowledges the opposing view with a concessive opening (&#8220;While I understand Sam&#8217;s concern&#8230;&#8221;). Another drops in a concrete illustration (&#8220;A football player at a major university, for example&#8230;&#8221;). The closing line wraps the argument with a sharp contrast (&#8220;acknowledge that difference rather than ignore it&#8221;). The vocabulary fits the academic setting without sounding stiff: &#8220;demanding schedules,&#8221; &#8220;high-revenue sports,&#8221; &#8220;compensation model.&#8221; It reads the way a confident student sounds in a college-level discussion.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Language accuracy.<\/strong> There are two minor spelling errors&mdash;&#8221;competitons&#8221; and &#8220;recieve&#8221;&mdash;but both look like fast-typing slips, not gaps in knowledge. The rubric at Score 5 specifically makes room for &#8220;common typos or common misspellings&#8221;&mdash;the kind of small mistakes anyone might make when writing under a timer. Everything else&mdash;grammar, word forms, punctuation&mdash;is clean.<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"border-left: 4px solid #4d2079; background: #F9FAFB; padding: 1em 1.2em; margin: 1em 0; border-radius: 6px; box-shadow: 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,0.05);\">\n<p><strong>Pro tip:<\/strong> This response clocks in at about 125 words &mdash; not much more than the 100-word minimum. You don&#8217;t need volume; you need to engage with both classmates and back your opinion with something specific. A focused, well-supported response will always outscore a longer one that stays vague.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><!-- ==================== SCORE 4 ==================== --><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"color: #4D2079;\" id=\"score-4\">Score 4: A Generally Successful Response<\/h2>\n<p class=\"tooltip-instruction\">Hover over the highlighted text to see specific feedback.<\/p>\n<div class=\"sample-response\">\n<p>I believe college athletes should recieve some form of payment beyond their scholarships.<\/p>\n<p>Lena makes a strong argument that these students sacrifice a lot of their personal time for the benefit of the university. I think this is an important point because many atheletes train for several hours every day and still have to keep up with their classes. <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">It is not fair. They work very hard. They do not get paid for the money they help bring in.<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Three short, simple sentences in a row. Each one makes its point, but stringing them together like this feels choppy. Combining them into one or two longer sentences would sound more fluent.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">While Sam has a good point about team spirit<span class=\"tooltip-text\">This acknowledges Sam but doesn&#8217;t really address what he said. Sam&#8217;s concern was about inequality between sports and losing the educational mission&mdash;this response skips over those specifics.<\/span><\/span> I think we can find a way to pay athletes without losing the sense of teamwork. For example universities could set a standard amount for all athletes so it stays equal. This would be <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">more then<span class=\"tooltip-text\">&#8220;More then&#8221; should be &#8220;more than.&#8221;<\/span><\/span> just a scholarship and it would show that the university values their effort.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #C5168C;\">Why this is a Score 4<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Elaboration and relevance.<\/strong> The writer states a clear opinion and engages with both classmates by name. Lena&#8217;s argument is paraphrased adequately (&#8220;these students sacrifice a lot of their personal time&#8221;), and the writer builds on it with a fair-enough explanation of why this matters. The response to Sam is weaker, though &mdash; &#8220;While Sam has a good point about team spirit&#8221; acknowledges him, but it doesn&#8217;t really address <em>what<\/em> Sam said or explain why team spirit wouldn&#8217;t be harmed. The proposed solution (a standard amount for all athletes) is a reasonable idea but stays vague &mdash; how much? who decides? &mdash; and it doesn&#8217;t fully answer Sam&#8217;s concern about inequality between sports. Compared to the Score 5, there&#8217;s also no specific example grounding the argument. Phrases like &#8220;many atheletes train for several hours every day&#8221; make the point but don&#8217;t bring it to life the way the Score 5&#8217;s football player schedule does.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Syntax and vocabulary.<\/strong> The writing is clear but less varied. The middle section falls into a choppy rhythm &mdash; &#8220;It is not fair. They work very hard. They do not get paid for the money they help bring in.&#8221; Each sentence makes its point, but stringing short, simple statements together like this feels flat compared to the Score 5, where ideas flow into each other through longer, more connected sentences. The vocabulary is serviceable (&#8220;sacrifice,&#8221; &#8220;benefit,&#8221; &#8220;teamwork&#8221;) but doesn&#8217;t show as much range or precision.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Language accuracy.<\/strong> A handful of errors: &#8220;recieve&#8221; and &#8220;atheletes&#8221; are both misspelled, &#8220;more then&#8221; should be &#8220;more than,&#8221; and a comma is missing after &#8220;team spirit&#8221; before &#8220;I think we can find a way.&#8221; Individually these are minor, but together they give the response a rougher feel than the Score 5.<\/p>\n<p><!-- ==================== SCORE 3 ==================== --><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"color: #4D2079;\" id=\"score-3\">Score 3: A Partially Successful Response<\/h2>\n<p class=\"tooltip-instruction\">Hover over the highlighted text to see specific feedback.<\/p>\n<div class=\"sample-response\">\n<p>I think college atheletes should get compansation because they work <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">like, really hard<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Too casual for an academic discussion post. This sounds more like a conversation with a friend than a class discussion.<\/span><\/span> for the university. Lena said that they spend many hours for training and I agree because it is very unfair that they do all this work and <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">university earned<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Two issues: missing &#8220;the&#8221; before &#8220;university,&#8221; and &#8220;earned&#8221; is past tense when the rest of the response uses present tense. Should be &#8220;the university earns.&#8221;<\/span><\/span> a ton of money from them. The atheletes play for university and they are the reason people buy tickets and watch on television. If <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">student is very good in sports<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Missing &#8220;a&#8221; before &#8220;student,&#8221; and &#8220;good in sports&#8221; doesn&#8217;t sound natural&mdash;we&#8217;d say &#8220;good at sports.&#8221;<\/span><\/span> and help the school make money, they should get more then just a scholership. The university should give some money to the players so they can also pay for other things they need.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #C5168C;\">Why this is a Score 3<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Elaboration and relevance.<\/strong> The writer takes a clear position and brings in Lena by name, paraphrasing her point about training hours. But Sam never comes up &mdash; only one side of the discussion gets addressed. The elaboration is also thin: &#8220;it is very unfair&#8221; is stated but never unpacked. Why is it unfair? What should change? The writer does mention that athletes are &#8220;the reason people buy tickets and watch on television,&#8221; which starts to build a new point, but it stops there without any follow-through. Naming both classmates and swapping out vague claims (&#8220;really hard,&#8221; &#8220;very unfair&#8221;) for one concrete reason or example would go a long way here.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Syntax and vocabulary.<\/strong> The sentence patterns are repetitive &mdash; most follow the same subject-verb-complement structure without much variation. The vocabulary leans on vague intensifiers: &#8220;very unfair,&#8221; &#8220;really hard,&#8221; &#8220;a ton of money.&#8221; The phrase &#8220;good in sports&#8221; doesn&#8217;t sound natural in English; we&#8217;d say &#8220;good at sports.&#8221; And &#8220;like, really hard&#8221; is too casual for an academic discussion &mdash; it sounds more like a conversation with a friend. Mixing in different sentence types and choosing more precise words would help push this toward a 4.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Language accuracy.<\/strong> The errors here go beyond quick typos. &#8220;Compansation,&#8221; &#8220;atheletes,&#8221; and &#8220;scholership&#8221; suggest the writer isn&#8217;t fully sure how these words are spelled, rather than just typing fast. &#8220;University earned&#8221; slips into past tense when the rest of the response uses present. Articles drop out in several spots: &#8220;university earned&#8221; (should be &#8220;the university earns&#8221;), &#8220;If student is very good&#8221; (should be &#8220;If a student&#8221;), &#8220;play for university&#8221; (should be &#8220;play for the university&#8221;). And &#8220;help&#8221; should be &#8220;helps&#8221; to match the singular &#8220;student.&#8221; None of these errors make the response unreadable, but they pile up and pull it down.<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"border-left: 4px solid #4d2079; background: #F9FAFB; padding: 1em 1.2em; margin: 1em 0; border-radius: 6px; box-shadow: 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,0.05);\">\n<p><strong>Pro tip:<\/strong> If your writing looks similar to this Score 3, focus on two things: first, engage with both classmates by name, not just one. Second, replace general claims (&#8220;they work really hard,&#8221; &#8220;it is very unfair&#8221;) with a specific reason or example that adds something new to the discussion.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><!-- ==================== SCORE 2 ==================== --><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"color: #4D2079;\" id=\"score-2\">Score 2: A Mostly Unsuccessful Response<\/h2>\n<p class=\"tooltip-instruction\">Hover over the highlighted text to see specific feedback.<\/p>\n<div class=\"sample-response\">\n<p>I think athletes shoud be payed becuse it is fair. <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">Lena is right<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Mentions Lena but doesn&#8217;t engage with her idea&mdash;no paraphrasing, no development of what she actually said.<\/span><\/span> the athletes is working very hard and the univercity get a lot of money. They practice every day and play games. <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">The important of athletes is very big<span class=\"tooltip-text\">&#8220;Important&#8221; is an adjective&mdash;the noun form &#8220;importance&#8221; is needed here: &#8220;The importance of athletes is very big.&#8221;<\/span><\/span> and the school need to give them money not only scholarship. <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">Athletes deserve more money becuse they help the school and it is not fair to not pay them.<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Circular reasoning&mdash;&#8221;it is fair&#8221; at the start and &#8220;it is not fair to not pay them&#8221; at the end say the same thing without explaining WHY it&#8217;s fair.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #C5168C;\">Why this is a Score 2<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Elaboration and relevance.<\/strong> The writer states an opinion (&#8220;athletes should be paid&#8221;) and mentions Lena, but the engagement stops at &#8220;Lena is right&#8221; &mdash; there&#8217;s no paraphrasing, no development of what Lena actually argued. Sam doesn&#8217;t come up at all. The reasoning is circular: athletes should be paid &#8220;because it is fair&#8221; and &#8220;it is not fair to not pay them&#8221; says the same thing twice without explaining <em>why<\/em> it&#8217;s fair. To move forward, the writer needs to break out of this loop with an actual reason or example.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Syntax and vocabulary.<\/strong> The sentences are short and follow the same pattern from start to finish. The vocabulary stays narrow &mdash; &#8220;very hard,&#8221; &#8220;very big,&#8221; &#8220;a lot of money&#8221; &mdash; and some word choices miss the mark. &#8220;The important of athletes&#8221; uses the adjective &#8220;important&#8221; where the noun &#8220;importance&#8221; is needed. &#8220;Payed&#8221; should be &#8220;paid.&#8221; Rather than building an argument that moves forward, the response cycles through similar statements (&#8220;athletes work hard,&#8221; &#8220;athletes deserve money,&#8221; &#8220;it is not fair&#8221;) without connecting them.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Language accuracy.<\/strong> Several errors stack up and make the response harder to follow. Verbs don&#8217;t match their subjects in multiple places: &#8220;the athletes is working&#8221; (should be &#8220;are working&#8221;), &#8220;the school need&#8221; (should be &#8220;needs&#8221;), &#8220;the univercity get&#8221; (should be &#8220;gets&#8221;). Spelling issues include &#8220;shoud,&#8221; &#8220;becuse,&#8221; &#8220;payed,&#8221; and &#8220;univercity.&#8221; Punctuation is also missing where it&#8217;s needed &mdash; &#8220;Lena is right the athletes is working very hard&#8221; runs two ideas together without a period or semicolon after &#8220;right.&#8221; Together, these errors make it difficult for the reader to stay focused on the message.<\/p>\n<p><!-- ==================== SCORE 1 ==================== --><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"color: #4D2079;\" id=\"score-1\">Score 1: An Unsuccessful Response<\/h2>\n<p class=\"tooltip-instruction\">Hover over the highlighted text to see specific feedback.<\/p>\n<div class=\"sample-response\">\n<p><span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">College athletes should have financial compensation.<span class=\"tooltip-text\">&#8220;Financial compensation&#8221; sounds more advanced than the rest of the writing&mdash;this phrase appears to be borrowed from the professor&#8217;s prompt rather than produced by the writer.<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">Is very importent<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Missing a subject&mdash;should be &#8220;It is very important&#8221; or &#8220;This is very important.&#8221;<\/span><\/span> becuse they make <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">significant revenue<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Another phrase likely borrowed from the prompt. The most fluent-sounding language in this response comes directly from the stimulus.<\/span><\/span> for university. <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">Should be pay more.<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Fragment with no subject and a wrong verb form&mdash;should be &#8220;They should be paid more.&#8221;<\/span><\/span> Scholarship is not enough for athletes they need money for training and life.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #C5168C;\">Why this is a Score 1<\/h3>\n<p><strong>Elaboration and relevance.<\/strong> The writer does attempt to address the topic &mdash; compensation, revenue, and scholarships all come up, which shows some awareness of what&#8217;s being discussed. But neither Lena nor Sam is mentioned. The response doesn&#8217;t engage with the discussion at all; it reads more like a few isolated statements about the general topic. The support is paper-thin: &#8220;Is very importent&#8221; is asserted with nothing behind it. Referencing at least one classmate&#8217;s idea and giving even one concrete reason for the opinion would make a real difference.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Syntax and vocabulary.<\/strong> Most sentences are very short, and several are incomplete. &#8220;Is very importent&#8221; has no subject (&#8220;It&#8221; or &#8220;This&#8221;). &#8220;Should be pay more&#8221; is a fragment with the wrong verb form &mdash; it should be &#8220;should be paid more.&#8221; Some of the vocabulary &mdash; &#8220;financial compensation,&#8221; &#8220;significant revenue&#8221; &mdash; sounds noticeably more advanced than the rest of the writing, which suggests these phrases were lifted from the prompt rather than produced independently. Working on writing complete sentences with a clear subject, verb, and connecting logic would be the most impactful next step.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Language accuracy.<\/strong> Errors are serious and frequent. &#8220;Importent&#8221; should be &#8220;important.&#8221; &#8220;Becuse&#8221; should be &#8220;because.&#8221; &#8220;Should be pay&#8221; should be &#8220;should be paid.&#8221; &#8220;They need money for training and life&#8221; runs straight into the previous sentence with no punctuation to separate them. The phrases that read most smoothly (&#8220;financial compensation,&#8221; &#8220;significant revenue&#8221;) appear to come directly from the stimulus. Focusing on basic sentence patterns &mdash; especially making sure every sentence has a subject and a correct verb form &mdash; would help the most.<\/p>\n<p><!-- ==================== SCORE 0 ==================== --><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"color: #4D2079;\" id=\"score-0\">Score 0: No Scorable Response<\/h2>\n<div class=\"sample-response\">\n<p>I think that <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">student athletes generate significant revenue through ticket sales, merchandise, and broadcasting deals<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Copied word-for-word from Dr. Moreno&#8217;s question.<\/span><\/span>. <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">They spend countless hours training and competing.<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Copied from Lena&#8217;s post.<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">A scholarship covers tuition, but they contribute substantially to their universities&#8217; income.<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Stitched together from Lena (&#8220;a scholarship covers tuition&#8221;) and Dr. Moreno (&#8220;contribute substantially to their universities&#8217; income&#8221;).<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"tooltip-highlight improve\" tabindex=\"0\">A full scholarship is already a significant benefit that many students would love to have.<span class=\"tooltip-text\">Copied word-for-word from Sam&#8217;s post.<\/span><\/span> So I think college athletes should receive compensation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color: #C5168C;\">Why this is a Score 0<\/h3>\n<p>This one is tricky. On the surface it looks reasonable &mdash; the English is smooth, the sentences are grammatically sound, and it seems to address the topic. But read it again carefully, this time comparing it to the prompt and the classmates&#8217; posts. Almost every phrase is <strong>lifted directly from the source texts<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Compare these phrases side by side:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>&#8220;student athletes generate significant revenue through ticket sales, merchandise, and broadcasting deals&#8221;<\/strong> &mdash; copied word-for-word from Dr. Moreno&#8217;s question.<\/li>\n<li><strong>&#8220;They spend countless hours training and competing&#8221;<\/strong> &mdash; copied from Lena&#8217;s post.<\/li>\n<li><strong>&#8220;A scholarship covers tuition, but they contribute substantially to their universities&#8217; income&#8221;<\/strong> &mdash; stitched together from Lena (&#8220;a scholarship covers tuition&#8221;) and Dr. Moreno (&#8220;contribute substantially to their universities&#8217; income&#8221;).<\/li>\n<li><strong>&#8220;A full scholarship is already a significant benefit that many students would love to have&#8221;<\/strong> &mdash; copied word-for-word from Sam&#8217;s post.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The only original language is &#8220;I think that&#8221; at the beginning and &#8220;So I think college athletes should receive compensation&#8221; at the end. Everything in between is borrowed. The writer hasn&#8217;t expressed an opinion in their own words, hasn&#8217;t engaged with either classmate as a discussion partner, and hasn&#8217;t contributed any new ideas.<\/p>\n<p>The ETS rubric at Score 1 flags responses where &#8220;any coherent language is mostly borrowed from the stimulus.&#8221; A Score 0 goes further&mdash;there is essentially <strong>no original language<\/strong> here.<\/p>\n<p>This is an important warning: <strong>copying lots of content from the prompt or the classmates&#8217; posts will not help your score.<\/strong> Even if the result looks polished, ETS is looking for your original ideas in your own words. A short but genuine attempt will always score higher than copied text, no matter how good the copied text sounds.<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"border-left: 4px solid #4d2079; background: #F9FAFB; padding: 1em 1.2em; margin: 1em 0; border-radius: 6px; box-shadow: 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,0.05);\">\n<p><strong>Pro tip:<\/strong> If you&#8217;re running out of time or feel stuck, write even just three or four original sentences with your own opinion and one reason. A genuine but brief response will earn more credit than copied text.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><!-- ==================== KEY TAKEAWAYS ==================== --><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"color: #4D2079;\" id=\"takeaways\">Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a summary of what separates each score level and what to focus on if you&#8217;re aiming to move up:<\/p>\n<div class=\"table-responsive\">\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse; margin: 1em 0;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #4D2079; color: white;\">\n<th style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Score<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">What It Looks Like<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">To Move Up, Focus On&#8230;<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\"><strong>5<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Clear opinion, engages both classmates by name with paraphrasing, adds new reasoning or a specific example. Varied sentences. Near-zero errors.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">You&#8217;re at the top&mdash;maintain this level by practicing under 10-minute time pressure.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9;\">\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\"><strong>4<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Clear opinion, engages both classmates but with less depth. Adequate vocabulary. A few minor errors.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Add a specific example. Paraphrase classmates&#8217; ideas more fully instead of just naming them.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\"><strong>3<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Opinion stated but thinly supported. May engage only one classmate. Limited vocabulary. Register slips. Noticeable errors.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Engage with both classmates by name. Replace vague claims with concrete reasons.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9;\">\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\"><strong>2<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Opinion barely developed. Little engagement with classmates. Very limited vocabulary. Frequent errors.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Focus on task completion: state your opinion, name both classmates, give one supporting reason.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\"><strong>1<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Barely addresses the task. Very short, fragmented. Language mostly borrowed from the prompt.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Practice writing complete sentences that express your own opinion on the topic.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9;\">\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\"><strong>0<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Copied from the prompt or classmates&#8217; posts. No original content.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Write your own words. Even a few original sentences will score higher than copied text.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p><!-- ==================== FAQ ==================== --><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"color: #4D2079;\" id=\"faq\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<h3 style=\"color: #C5168C;\">Do I need to agree with one classmate and disagree with the other?<\/h3>\n<p>It&#8217;s not required, but it&#8217;s one of the easiest ways to organize a strong response. When you agree with one classmate and push back on the other, you naturally end up with a clear structure: your position, a point you&#8217;re building on, and a counterargument you&#8217;re addressing. That covers all the bases. You can also partially agree with both classmates, but picking a clear side tends to be simpler to pull off in 10 minutes.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #C5168C;\">How long should my Academic Discussion response be?<\/h3>\n<p>Shoot for <strong>120&ndash;130 words<\/strong>. The official minimum is 100, but giving yourself a little extra room makes it easier to engage with both classmates and still include a solid supporting point. Our Score 5 lands around 125 words. That said, word count alone won&#8217;t raise your score &mdash; a tight 110-word response with genuine engagement and specific support will beat a rambling 150-word response that circles the same vague idea.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #C5168C;\">What&#8217;s the biggest difference between a Score 3 and a Score 4?<\/h3>\n<p>It comes down to two things. First, <strong>how fully you engage with both classmates<\/strong>: a Score 4 brings both into the discussion and responds to their ideas, while a Score 3 may skip one entirely or just name-drop without addressing what they actually said. Second, <strong>how specific your support is<\/strong>: a Score 4 gives enough detail that the reader can follow the reasoning, while a Score 3 tends to assert without explaining (&#8220;it is very unfair&#8221; &mdash; but why? what should be different?).<\/p>\n<p><!-- ==================== WHAT'S NEXT ==================== --><\/p>\n<h2 style=\"color: #4D2079;\" id=\"whats-next\">What&#8217;s Next?<\/h2>\n<p>The most useful thing you can do now is write. Pick a prompt, give yourself 10 minutes, and then come back here to see which score level your response resembles most closely. That feedback loop &mdash; write, compare, adjust &mdash; is what turns rubric knowledge into real improvement.<\/p>\n<p>If you want ready-made language to speed up your writing, our <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-templates\/\">TOEFL Writing Templates and phrase menus<\/a><\/strong> guide has plug-and-play phrases for stating your opinion, agreeing and disagreeing with classmates, and supporting your points.<\/p>\n<p>And when you&#8217;re ready for personalized feedback, <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/toefl.magoosh.com\/plans\">Magoosh TOEFL Premium<\/a><\/strong> includes unlimited AI-powered scoring for Academic Discussion tasks. Write as many practice responses as you want and get rubric-aligned feedback on each one &mdash; so you always know where you stand and what to sharpen next.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What does a high-scoring TOEFL Academic Discussion response actually look like? And what separates a Score 4 from a Score 3? The ETS rubric talks about &#8220;relevant and well-elaborated explanations&#8221; and &#8220;an accumulation of errors in sentence structure&#8221; &mdash; but what do those phrases actually mean in a real discussion post? That&#8217;s hard to picture [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":42,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13619],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[13628],"class_list":["post-13954","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-writing"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v21.7 (Yoast SEO v21.7) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Sample Responses - Magoosh Blog \u2013 TOEFL\u00ae\ufe0f Test<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Sample TOEFL Academic Discussion responses for every score level, with commentary explaining what works, what doesn&#039;t, and how to improve.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Sample Responses\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sample TOEFL Academic Discussion responses for every score level, with commentary explaining what works, what doesn&#039;t, and how to improve.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Magoosh Blog \u2013 TOEFL\u00ae\ufe0f Test\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/facebook.com\/MagooshTOEFL\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-09T17:26:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/files\/2026\/03\/AcademicDiscussionResponses-1.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Lucas Fink\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@MagooshTOEFL\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@MagooshTOEFL\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Lucas Fink\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/\",\"name\":\"TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Sample Responses - Magoosh Blog \u2013 TOEFL\u00ae\ufe0f Test\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-09T17:26:39+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/#\/schema\/person\/c06e6a007d0b81117c00610ed88b6c7d\"},\"description\":\"Sample TOEFL Academic Discussion responses for every score level, with commentary explaining what works, what doesn't, and how to improve.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Sample Responses\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/\",\"name\":\"Magoosh Blog \u2013 TOEFL\u00ae\ufe0f Test\",\"description\":\"Online TOEFL Preparation\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/#\/schema\/person\/c06e6a007d0b81117c00610ed88b6c7d\",\"name\":\"Lucas Fink\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/23cc892a81aad0b2904e4f690b7e865a\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f798c830d96fa5dd3ad9b315d568569879bff638b794899ecd3c8ce9f5fa932b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f798c830d96fa5dd3ad9b315d568569879bff638b794899ecd3c8ce9f5fa932b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Lucas Fink\"},\"description\":\"Lucas is the teacher behind Magoosh TOEFL. He\u2019s been teaching TOEFL preparation and more general English since 2009, and the SAT since 2008. Between his time at Bard College and teaching abroad, he has studied Japanese, Czech, and Korean. None of them come in handy, nowadays.\",\"knowsAbout\":[\"TOEFL\",\"SAT\",\"ACT\",\"Data science\"],\"knowsLanguage\":[\"English\",\"Japanese\",\"Czech\",\"Korean\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/author\/lucasvf\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Sample Responses - Magoosh Blog \u2013 TOEFL\u00ae\ufe0f Test","description":"Sample TOEFL Academic Discussion responses for every score level, with commentary explaining what works, what doesn't, and how to improve.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Sample Responses","og_description":"Sample TOEFL Academic Discussion responses for every score level, with commentary explaining what works, what doesn't, and how to improve.","og_url":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/","og_site_name":"Magoosh Blog \u2013 TOEFL\u00ae\ufe0f Test","article_publisher":"https:\/\/facebook.com\/MagooshTOEFL","article_published_time":"2026-03-09T17:26:39+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/files\/2026\/03\/AcademicDiscussionResponses-1.jpg"}],"author":"Lucas Fink","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@MagooshTOEFL","twitter_site":"@MagooshTOEFL","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Lucas Fink","Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/","url":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/","name":"TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Sample Responses - Magoosh Blog \u2013 TOEFL\u00ae\ufe0f Test","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-03-09T17:26:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/#\/schema\/person\/c06e6a007d0b81117c00610ed88b6c7d"},"description":"Sample TOEFL Academic Discussion responses for every score level, with commentary explaining what works, what doesn't, and how to improve.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/toefl-writing-academic-discussion-sample-responses\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Sample Responses"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/#website","url":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/","name":"Magoosh Blog \u2013 TOEFL\u00ae\ufe0f Test","description":"Online TOEFL Preparation","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/#\/schema\/person\/c06e6a007d0b81117c00610ed88b6c7d","name":"Lucas Fink","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/23cc892a81aad0b2904e4f690b7e865a","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f798c830d96fa5dd3ad9b315d568569879bff638b794899ecd3c8ce9f5fa932b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f798c830d96fa5dd3ad9b315d568569879bff638b794899ecd3c8ce9f5fa932b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Lucas Fink"},"description":"Lucas is the teacher behind Magoosh TOEFL. He\u2019s been teaching TOEFL preparation and more general English since 2009, and the SAT since 2008. Between his time at Bard College and teaching abroad, he has studied Japanese, Czech, and Korean. None of them come in handy, nowadays.","knowsAbout":["TOEFL","SAT","ACT","Data science"],"knowsLanguage":["English","Japanese","Czech","Korean"],"url":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/author\/lucasvf\/"}]}},"authors":[{"term_id":13628,"user_id":42,"is_guest":0,"slug":"lucasvf","display_name":"Lucas Fink","avatar_url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f798c830d96fa5dd3ad9b315d568569879bff638b794899ecd3c8ce9f5fa932b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","user_url":"","last_name":"Fink","first_name":"Lucas","description":"Lucas is the teacher behind Magoosh TOEFL. He\u2019s been teaching TOEFL preparation and more general English since 2009, and the SAT since 2008. Between his time at Bard College and teaching abroad, he has studied Japanese, Czech, and Korean. None of them come in handy, nowadays."}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13954","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/42"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13954"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13954\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13954"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13954"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13954"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/magoosh.com\/toefl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=13954"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}