offers hundreds of practice questions and video explanations. Go there now.

Sign up or log in to Magoosh LSAT Prep.

“Unless” Statements on the LSAT: Part 1

In our continuing exploration of the wonderful world of formal logic, I bring you: unless.

But this time, you have to work it out for yourself via this real world example:

    I refuse to keep writing formal logic blog posts unless some of you post comments telling me that you’re finding these helpful. 😉

 

A Quick Challenge

Your challenge is to figure out how to translate the statement above into a standard if/then form. Here are some questions to ponder as you work through this one:

    What can you be absolutely sure of if…

      — I refuse to write another formal logic blog post?
      — one person posts a comment telling me he/she finds this post helpful?
      — I write another formal logic blog post?
      — two or more people posts comments telling me they find these posts helpful?
      — no one posts any comments at all?

 

The truth of one term is sufficient to deduce the truth of the other term. The truth of that other term is necessary, but not sufficient, to deduce the truth of the former. But can you tell which is which?

Think through the answer to each of these questions. Then, on your own, try to determine whether the statement, “A unless B” is logically equivalent to “if A→ B”. If so, that’s conveniently simple. If not, then how do you translate “A unless B” into a standard if/then form? And what is its contrapositive?

Lastly, which term is the trigger in the statement “A unless B”? And what is the trigger in the contrapositive?
 

When You’re Done

Once you’ve spent some time working on this one, post a comment with your answer or check back soon for an explanation.

And if you missed the posts on If/then statements and contrapositives, or alternate forms of if/then statements, check those out now for more help with the unless challenge.

Happy studying! 🙂
 
 

By the way, improve your LSAT score with Magoosh online test prep! Most Popular Resources   * LSAT Study Plans <https://magoosh.com/lsat/lsat-study-plans><noscript><img class=

4 Responses to “Unless” Statements on the LSAT: Part 1

  1. Hans Christian Zoll May 5, 2016 at 9:58 AM #

    -No B (some DIDN’T post comments)
    -no A (because B did occur once)
    -B (indicates B occured)
    -no A (Travis didn’t refuse because comments were posted)
    -A (Travis refused because B didn’t occur)

    • Travis Coleman
      Travis Coleman May 5, 2016 at 9:00 PM #

      Nice work, Hans! One small clarification:

      If I refuse to write another formal logic blog post, that means that NO ONE posted a comment. I think that’s what you meant when you said “some DIDN’T post comments,” but that’s slightly confusing wording. Remember, the opposite of “some/someone” is “none/no one.” It’ll make your life a lot easier on the exam if you get used to that wording.

      Let me know if you have any other questions!

      Travis 

      • Shahd August 29, 2018 at 10:37 AM #

        That was very useful

  2. Aubert Monteau August 5, 2017 at 12:33 PM #

    1) You refuse to write another formal logic blog post, in that case, we can be sure that none of us has posted a comment …
    2) One person…You keep writing post
    3) You write another….at least someone has posted a comment
    4) 2 or more people…You keep writing post
    5) None posts comment at all…You stop writing blog post


Magoosh blog comment policy: To create the best experience for our readers, we will only approve comments that are relevant to the article, general enough to be helpful to other students, concise, and well-written! 😄 Due to the high volume of comments across all of our blogs, we cannot promise that all comments will receive responses from our instructors.

We highly encourage students to help each other out and respond to other students' comments if you can!

If you are a Premium Magoosh student and would like more personalized service from our instructors, you can use the Help tab on the Magoosh dashboard. Thanks!

Leave a Reply