Gruber’s Complete GRE Guide 2012: Book Review

Gruber’s Math

For Math, Gruber’s goes through the basics. It provides practice problems and voilà you are ready for the GRE. Or are you?

Gruber’s Math is lacking on four levels:

Layout: This is probably one of the last user-friendly GRE prep guides from the standpoint of layout. The math section especially feels like an information dump. I imagine must students despairing as they try to make their ways through the dense, busy pages.

Accuracy of Questions: The math questions do not really reflect the questions written by ETS. Sure you get practice on basic concepts, but the subtlety, aka trickiness, of the problems is absent.

Improve your GRE score with Magoosh.

Advanced Questions: Gruber’s isn’t the way to go especially if you are looking to get a competitive score. Most of the questions are at the medium to easy-medium level. Not too much to challenge.

Efficacy of Approaches: There are quick approaches to solving problems. Gruber, however, sticks to the old plodding methods. Really helpful strategies such as ball-parking and plugging in are not mentioned.


Gruber’s Verbal

The Verbal section of Gruber’s is sorely lacking. At times some of the reading passages feel as though I’m sitting for a state test for high school sophomores. Other times, reading passages feel like an easy SAT.

Things don’t get much better with Text Completions. Even if you take a cursory look at the ETS book will realize that Text Completions can be as long as four-sentences. Gruber’s only provides one-sentence text completions. Oh yeah, these questions are also very easy, so if you want to prep for the GRE – whether for text completions or reading comprehension – do not use this book, unless you want to be in for a nasty surprise.

That Gruber’s content is sorely lacking is perhaps a reflection of how Gruber hasn’t really adjusted to the New GRE. Even the vocabulary approach is a relic from the old test – memorize a massive 3,400-word list with words that would only show up in the analogy section (shambles – a slaughterhouse….really, Gruber’s?).

Learning vocabulary in context is totally passed over for the potentially dangerous strategy of word grouping (or word lumping) and the simply not that helpful word root list. In the former case, you will associate words that have important nuances – nuances that will be tested on the GRE.


Video Review

Grade: C-/D+



Gruber’s is a dumbed-down GRE, one that feels like a mix between the old GRE and an easy SAT. It fails to provide helpful math or verbal strategies, nor the level of practice questions you need to prepare you for test day. The verbal especially hews to the old GRE approach  – big lists, subpar definitions, roots lists, and overly general vocab grouping.  Best avoided.

This is the ninth in a series of new GRE book reviews. 

P.S. Ready to improve your GRE score? Get started today.

Most Popular Resources

4 Responses to Gruber’s Complete GRE Guide 2012: Book Review

  1. Kratika August 14, 2017 at 1:49 am #

    Just tried a few quants question from Gruber’s e-book, the questions are only comparable with GRE / Magoosh’s easiest level. And it has so many mistakes and vague explanations.

    See an example below :

    Ques: Given an alphabet of 26 letters, with 21 consonants, and 5 vowels, approximately how many three-letter words can be formed with a
    vowel as the middle letter and a consonant as the last letter?

    Solution: When you see the word approximately, you are being told to Ballpark. In this case, you have 26 possible letters for that slot (that slot?? which slot??), 5 for the second slot, and 21 for the third slot. Estimate and call this 25 × 20 × 5. The total is 2,500.

    What??? Where did this 25 and 20 come from??? And its a clear counting question, why do we need to ballpark?? :O

    So you can see this book will leave you confused with so many open ended questions. I think, that explains my point well, please don’t use this book unless you want to screw your exam.

  2. Pemdas@BTG February 13, 2012 at 6:45 pm #

    and yes, I’m surprised it’s not D- or F with no credit to Gruber’s

    • Chris Lele
      Chris February 14, 2012 at 11:44 am #

      Yes, Gruber’s is definitely a mistake – but the bar has been set so low that the D- has become the C- (actually I had originally intended to give it a D+ so I’ve added that back into the text). With McGraw Hill and REA out there, we would have to develop new grades, e.g. G = Garbage, were I to give Gruber’s an ‘F’.

  3. Pemdas@BTG February 13, 2012 at 6:42 pm #

    Gruber’s GRE book is a *mistake* of publishers, perhaps such notion would embrace everything Chris wanted to convey.

Magoosh blog comment policy: To create the best experience for our readers, we will only approve comments that are relevant to the article, general enough to be helpful to other students, concise, and well-written! 😄 Due to the high volume of comments across all of our blogs, we cannot promise that all comments will receive responses from our instructors.

We highly encourage students to help each other out and respond to other students' comments if you can!

If you are a Premium Magoosh student and would like more personalized service from our instructors, you can use the Help tab on the Magoosh dashboard. Thanks!

Leave a Reply