offers hundreds of practice questions and video explanations. Go there now.

# GRE Paragraph Argument Workshop – Part I

Before we embark, take a look at the following:

Downtown Greensborough is a major financial center in which many citizens either drive or rely on public transportation to get to work. This setup has led up to a spate in the number of pedestrians who have been struck and killed by vehicles. In an effort to curb the number of pedestrian-related fatalities, Greensborough has installed speed reduction signs at the six city intersections at which the highest numbers of fatalities have occurred in the last year. The Greensborough city government predicts that the number of traffic fatalities will significantly decrease once the speed reduction signs have been installed.

The above is your typical GRE paragraph argument and just another example of how the new GRE is hard. It contains a little background information (the traffic/pedestrian situation in Greensborough) before launching into the argument proper. A good first step is to identify the parts of the argument and simplify the paragraph to manageable sentence or two.

## Taking apart the argument

The first part of an argument is the premise(s). Think of the premises as the facts. In the paragraph argument above the fact are as follows:

1) Greensborough has many pedestrian fatalities in its bustling downtown area

2) Signs warning motorists to slow down will be installed

3) The signs will be installed only at the six most dangerous intersections

Now that we’ve identified the premises, we want to find the conclusion. The conclusion is a definitive statement that is based on the premises. That is the author of the paragraph argument is not whipping the conclusion from thin air. The conclusion is based on the premises, and almost always comes at the end of the paragraph.

Conclusion: once the signs go up, the number of pedestrian deaths will go down.

In the Paragraph Argument on the GRE, the conclusion is never airtight. What I mean is that the conclusion does not connect perfectly to the premises—there are some holes, or logical gaps. One way to identify them is by using “What ifs”.

For instance:

What if motorists never look at the traffic signs?

What if the signs aren’t prominently displayed?

What if drunk drivers were responsible for most of the fatalities? (That is I don’t think we can rely on drunk drivers to slow down because a sign tells them to).

The “holes” above are quite obvious. On the GRE, the correct answer will be more subtle, and will probably not be similar to one of the “What ifs” you come up with. Nonetheless, it is a good practice to start generating these “What ifs” to get you in the mindset to identify the correct answer.

See, some of the wrong answer choices are going to be very tempting. But none of them is going to directly attack the validity of the conclusion the way the correct answer does. Now that we’ve done the “What if” exercise, let’s actually turn this into a bona fide question.

Downtown Greensborough is a major financial center in which many citizens either drive or rely on public transportation to get to work. This setup has led up to a spate in the number of pedestrians who have been struck and killed by vehicles. In an effort to curb the number of pedestrian-related fatalities, Greensborough has installed speed reduction signs at the six city intersections at which the highest numbers of fatalities have occurred in the last year. The Greensborough city government predicts that the number of traffic fatalities will significantly decrease once the speed reduction signs have been installed.

Which of the following, if true, most undermines the validity of the conclusion?

(A)  Some of those who drive to work in downtown Greensborough do not have a valid driver’s license.

(B)  The number of annual pedestrian fatalities outside the downtown area is far less than in the downtown area.

(C)  The six intersections in which the signs are installed are responsible for only a fraction of pedestrian deaths.

(D) The new speed reduction signs will be in neon orange and prominently placed.

(E)  Red light cameras, which are used to catch motorists running red lights, were installed yet the number of pedestrian fatalities did not decrease.

## Solution

I’m guessing at least two—if not three—answer choices jumped out at you. A couple you were probably able to eliminate because they were either irrelevant to the paragraph or actually strengthened, not weakened, the conclusion.

Let’s first start with (A) and ask ourselves “What if?”. That is, what if some of the drivers do not have drivers licenses? Is that going to prevent the installation of traffic speed reduction signs from having their desired effect? You could answer ‘maybe’—as in maybe those who drive without a license are in general more dangerous drivers and will therefore outright ignore the signs. The correct answer on a GRE Paragraph Argument is not a ‘maybe.’ It is always a very strong ‘yes’; if A, then the plan will most likely not work.

With (B), we are talking about a part of town that is outside the downtown area. This shift in focus already makes this answer choice suspect (test prep books usually call such a shift ‘irrelevant’ or ‘out of scope’). Maybe the area outside has traffic reduction signs, maybe it doesn’t, maybe a lot of things. As with all ‘maybes’ on the Paragraph Argument, eliminate.

Now for (C): What if the six intersections in which the signs are installed are responsible for only a fraction of the pedestrian deaths? Sure, the intersections are the most dangerous, but if there are hundreds of intersections, then the aggregate fatalities from those intersections will easily surpass that of the six intersections. In other words, even if the signs actually cause a driver to reduce his speed, the plan will still not be effective because people will still be barreling through the ninety-five other intersections.  So we asked the “What if?”, and it turns out that the plan doesn’t look like it is going to work: speed reductions signs at six intersections are not going to dramatically lower the number of pedestrian fatalities. Therefore, the answer is (C).

(D), if anything, strengthens the argument, because if the speed reduction signs are obvious drivers are more likely to slow down. Definitely not a “slam dunk” strengthen, but clearly (D) does nothing to weaken the conclusion.

Finally, (E), which may have been the most tempting of the wrong answer choices. Indeed you may be thinking the following: If red light cameras didn’t slow down drivers, then will traffic reduction signs actually bring about the desired effect? The problem is red light cameras weren’t intended to slow down drivers, but rather to catch them in the act of running a red light. The traffic cameras could very well cause drivers to speed up, because they want to make the red light and “beat” the camera (I’ve actually been guilty of this more than once!).
Remember that the GRE is attempting to test your ability to question an argument. This is an especially useful skill to have if you’re studying the GRE for a PhD and you’ll have a dissertation to defend someday.

## Coming soon

In the next series, we will go through different question types—Strengthen, Paradox, etc.—and see how what we learned about the “holes” in the argument will pertain to these other question types.

### 12 Responses to GRE Paragraph Argument Workshop – Part I

1. Azarafza September 14, 2015 at 9:57 am #

I tried to adequately think over on each of the options separately. To clarify your explanations regarding to the correct answer, “Option E”, I suppose one can see the words,” speed reduction signs” which was mentioned in the paragraph, whereas, in option E, it’s told that “catch red lights” were installed, which clearly shows the contradiction. Am I right? Regarding your explanation for “option A”, let me have a big doubt on it. As a part of your explanations, you mentioned that “if A, then the plan will most likely not work.”. As far as I concerned, it means that if part of drivers didn’t have driving license, then the plan would not work. If this statement is right, then the right answer would be choice “A”. Will you please, elucidate it a bit more?

2. Ashwini August 18, 2015 at 1:19 pm #

Hi Chris,

I have chosen the option C, not because of the reason that you have mentioned. Please correct me if I am wrong.
So the question asks, Which of the following, if true, most undermines the validity of the conclusion?
Does this kind of question usually give external information that is not from the passage and ask what if choice a or b or c or d or e? in that case the only thing that matters is the conclusion and the information that is provided in the answer choices that replaces the content of the passage.

Is that correct?

Thank you!

3. Karnik August 15, 2013 at 5:09 pm #

Hey Chris,

I don’t think ‘C’ is right answer. As it states that the six intersection are responsible for fraction of fatalities, but it contradicts to the fact given in paragraph ” Greensborough has installed speed reduction signs at the six city intersections at which the highest numbers of fatalities have occurred in the last year”.

So correct answer choice for weakening question can have contradictory position to the fact stated in paragraph?

• Chris Lele August 16, 2013 at 1:15 pm #

Hi Karnik,

Though those two pieces of information seem to contradict each other, they actually don’t. The six intersections can be the six most dangerous intersections in the city, but that doesn’t mean that–in aggregate–they account for more deaths than those that occur at all of the other intersections. Imagine that there are 100 intersections. In the top six a total of 50 deaths occur. If a total of 200 pedestrian deaths occur each year in the city, than the other 94 intersections account for 150 deaths.

Hopefully that makes sense!

4. nandini June 24, 2013 at 8:42 am #

hi chris,
wonderful explanation cheers but i have a doubt.
can u explain me clearly y option E is not the correct answer?

• Chris Lele June 24, 2013 at 1:40 pm #

Hi Nandini,

So yes, that is a tricky one. The red light cameras did not help reduce pedestrian deaths. Perhaps speeding motorists did not know about them. The thing is we don’t know anything about the red light situation. It doesn’t tell us anything about the camera situation, and so is out of scope. Sure, it hints that the cameras MAY not be effective. But this is the sort of wishy-washy answer choice that is usually wrong.

Hope that helps!

5. Nehrin May 15, 2013 at 3:41 pm #

Hi chris

Thanks a lot for your detailed explanation.
Keep updating more on paragraph argument.

• Chris Lele May 16, 2013 at 2:00 pm #

More coming soon!

6. Ahmad May 15, 2013 at 12:04 pm #

Great explanations Chris, loving all of the videos. Many thanks for your efforts 🙂

• Chris Lele May 15, 2013 at 2:37 pm #

You are welcome!

7. Vanan May 14, 2013 at 11:09 am #

Hi Chris!
What is the answer for the above Paragraph argument?

• Chris Lele May 15, 2013 at 2:39 pm #

Hi Vanan,

The answer is (C). I updated the text to reflect this :).

Magoosh blog comment policy: To create the best experience for our readers, we will only approve comments that are relevant to the article, general enough to be helpful to other students, concise, and well-written! 😄 Due to the high volume of comments across all of our blogs, we cannot promise that all comments will receive responses from our instructors.

We highly encourage students to help each other out and respond to other students' comments if you can!

If you are a Premium Magoosh student and would like more personalized service from our instructors, you can use the Help tab on the Magoosh dashboard. Thanks!