## Practice Question

Solve this question. Allot yourself a strict 1.5 minute time limit.

1) In the figure, ABCD is a square, and all the dots are evenly spaced: each vertical or horizontal distance between two adjacent dots is 3 units. Find the area of the shaded region.

- 60
- 72
- 81
- 96
- 120

An explanation will follow below.

## Introduction

Some people find GRE Math hard because they are rusty at math in general: this post is not primarily addressed at those folks, although they may have some aha’s from reading this. There’s no substitute for learning the basic math content you need.

Other people are reasonably comfortable with the math itself, but often complain: “I *could* do most GRE Quant problems if I had enough time, but I always seem to run out of time.” “I just wish I could do GRE math faster.” Does this sound like something you have said? Then this is precisely the post for you.

## The brain

First, a quick overview of hemispheric differences in the brain — this will be review for some people. The cerebrum, the “intelligence” part of our brain, is divided into two halves: the left & right hemisphere. These control all the sensation & muscular movements on the opposite side of the body — if you want to move your left leg, it’s the right half of your brain that oversees this task. The two hemispheres also process information very differently. Here is a brief overview of hemispheric difference: notice which set of skills feels more comfortable, more natural to you.

The left hemisphere is about logic, organization, precision, and detail management. It specializes in **differentiation**, that is, telling the exact difference between closely related things. It’s very good at following clear rules, recipes, formulas, and procedures in a step-by-step logical way. The left brain controls the grammar and syntax of language, the formal, almost “mathematical”, side of language. If I were to say, “I are happy,” it would be your left brain that recognizes this as wrong.

The right hemisphere is intuition and pattern-matching. It specializes in **integration**, that is, seeing the underlying similarity or unity behind seemingly distinct things. We dream in the right brain. The right brain is responsible for myth, poetry, analogy and metaphor. It is often called the “artistic” side of the brain. It is good at information presented as symbols or images. It is good at facial recognition and voice recognition (notoriously hard problems for computers!) The left brain does grammar and syntax, but the right brain controls a very different side of language: emotional inflection, body language, innuendo and implication. If person A says “Today is a great day!” in a completely bright and bubbly way in all sincerity, and then person B says “Today is a great day!” in a way that is absolutely dripping with bitter sarcasm — then, according to the left brain, exactly the same thing was said twice (same grammar, same syntax, etc.); it’s only the right brain that senses the profound emotional difference between those two statements.

Most folks are naturally dominant in one of the two hemispheres. There is some association with handedness and hemispheric dominance: left-handed people are slightly more likely to be right-brain dominant. The extreme left-brain folks are hyper-organized and methodical, for example, an accountant. The extreme right-brain people are the wild artsy folks, or folks who live from one leap of intuition to the next.

## Math and the brain

Which hemisphere is better for math? Well, the detail-management and organization and precision of the left-brain are a huge help in arithmetic and algebra. Geometry is the only branch of math in which the right-brain pattern-matching skills can play some role. In general, left brain folks usually feel reasonably comfortable with math, and certainly can follow the methodical procedures with ease. Typically, the right brain folks tend to have a difficult time keeping all the details straight, although many times they tune into the “big picture” ideas faster.

Those are tendencies, but success in math — and in fact, success in almost anything that challenges our intelligence — involves developing both sides of the brain. One of the reasons Leonardo de Vinci is often regarded as one of the smartest people ever to walk the earth is because he demonstrated strong skills of both hemispheres.

What does this mean for your GRE Quant performance? Well, if you are a typical right brain person, you probably need to sharpen your understanding of all the rules and all the details, and learn to manage details with precision. That’s something that comes with practice, practice, practice. You may find this GMAT blog article useful, because it talks about learning math rules in a holistic way.

## The magic of right brain thinking

Now, for the left-brain folks: you probably know the rules reasonably well. You probably were generally a “good-at-math” kind of student. Probably, faced with most GRE Quant questions, you could figure out the right answer, given enough time. The catch, of course, is that you don’t have unlimited time on the GRE: just 40 minutes for 25 questions, or a little more than 90 seconds per question.

An overwhelming number of GRE Quant are designed specifically to punishing someone who is overly left-brained. In other words, they are designed so that if you take the methodical, step-by-step plodding approach, then yes, you would eventually reach the answer, but it would take you a very long time. Whenever that’s the case in a question, there’s always a way to reframe the question, so that the solution becomes very quick, sometimes almost immediate.

Whenever you see yourself starting out on a very straightforward, step-by-step, long haul calculation, stop yourself. This is always the challenge for left brain folks, but you have to re-frame the question, to understand the task from a different angle. You are looking for the “Leonardo da Vinci” solution to the problem.

## Example: the practice problem

Here, I will demonstrate with the practice problem. Yes, you could figure out separately the area of each triangle, each square, each trapezoid, and then add all those shapes together. That would take some time. Here’s a right brain solution to this question — rearrange the pieces!

First, slide the red piece up.

Now, slide the green piece into that blank space.

Now, flip the orange piece over diagonal BD.

Lo and behold! The shaded region accounts for exactly half the area of the big square. The big square is 12 x 12 = 144, so the shaded region is 144/2 = 72. Answer = **(B)**. Once you see the trick, the pattern, there is only the most minimal of calculations needed.

BTW, another reasonably quick right-brain approach would be simply to count all the little triangles.

The original shaded figure can be broken into 16 equal triangles. The full square is 16 little squares, or 32 triangles. Therefore, the area of the shaded figure is exactly half the area of the square.

## Learning to see

Some right-brain readers might revel in such solution. Meanwhile, some left-brain folks might be frustrated or annoyed at this point: “Great! Now that it’s pointed out, yes, that’s an efficient way to solve, but *how* am I supposed to *see* that on my own?”

Mastering the strengths and skills of your non-dominant hemisphere is never an easy task, but it can be done.

There are a wild variety of things one can do to enhance right-brain function. Read poetry. Look at art. Make art. Read about patterns in comparative mythology. Free-associate. Imagine. Follow chains of word associations. Slow down and really look at things. For example, everyone in the world has seen and could recognize Leonardo’s *Mona Lisa* painting, but have you ever really looked at it? If you stare at it for 15-20 minutes, really just sink into staring at it, you can see every possible human emotion run across that face. The left-brain is relatively quick: OK, Mona Lisa, I know that, done. The right-brain skills take more time to “warm up”, which is why you have to put your left-brain impatience on hold and really take some time with this. I used the *Mona Lisa* as an example here, but you could use almost any classic image. All of these practices can help a left-brain person, over time, to get more in touch with right brain abilities.

## Tips for Doing GRE Math Faster

1. If the problem asks for the value of an expression involving variables, chance are good there will be some way to solve for the value of the expression directly, without solving for the individual variables.

2. In “find the area of the shaded region” in which the region is particular complicated (as in the practice question), look for a way to rearrange and simplify.

3. If the problem is a geometry problem stated in words, always sketch a rough diagram, unless you can visualize the diagram directly.

4. If the problem is purely numerical or algebraic, consider whether there would be a way to visualize the problem (number line, x-y plane, etc.)

Here is the plan I would recommend for the extreme left-brain thinker who wants to accelerate her or his learning and mastery of the right-brain skills. From this point forward, whenever you practice GRE Quant, first of all, always practice against a strict time limit. Furthermore, the criterion is no longer: did I get the correct answer? No. Even if you got the correct answer, compare your solution to the official solution: if your solution is a slow methodical approach, and the official solution shows a shortcut, then for your purposes, **consider this a question you got wrong**. For every such question, force yourself to write down, verbally, the nature of the shortcut, and what you should have done to “see” that shortcut. Force yourself to have to put it into words and explain it: that will strengthen your inter-hemispheric connections. As you collect more and more write-ups like this, periodically go back to re-read the collection. Keep doing this consistently, learning from your mistakes, and before you know it, you will start “seeing” the Leonard-da-Vinci solutions to GRE Quant problems!

## More practice

These are two questions on which elegant shortcuts are possible.

1) http://gre.magoosh.com/questions/123

2) http://gre.magoosh.com/questions/86

Check out this post if you can’t even wrap your brain around how to study for GRE math.

### Most Popular Resources

16 shaded triangles of equal area. Done. Total shaded area = 16 * (9/2)

Mike, This was an amazing article. Thank you so much. One thing, though–I haven’t been able to find the “elegant shortcuts” for the two problems you linked. Could you give us a hint??

Hi Mike,

This was a very interesting approach to a solution. I actually timed my response and came up with a solution of counting all triangles in the figure in 1.5 minutes. The problem that i am facing in math section is that I am not able to mostly think creatively in math problems and even if I am able to reach an optimal solution to a problem, it rarely happens in the first attempt.

I am a creative person as I paint and also love music but I am also a programmer so it is difficult for me to classify myself in any of the mentioned categories.

Can you suggest how should i develop my problem solving skills better? I also feel i have a tendency to take stress during exams which also hampers my performance.

I have taken GRE once in which I scored 159 in quant which i believe is far from the score that i can actually attain. I am planning to attempt GRE again in a month’s time. Any suggestions regarding math section would be of great help.

Awesome blog! Got me thinking!

Here’s the approach that I took; I counted the shaded triangles and found them to be 16. I realized if I put two of these triangles would make a 3×3 Square. Therefore there would be eight such 3×3 Squares. The area of one 3×3 Square is 9; therefore eight such squares would be 8*9=72.

Dear Lenoy,

That’s a great way to go about it. I”m glad you found the blog helpful. Best of luck to you, my friend.

Mike 🙂

This was a nice one really.

Thank you very much. Best of luck to you.

Mike 🙂

excellent write-up…healed my monotony and triggered a second thought of considering problems in a different way 🙂

thank you Mike

Dear Hasan,

You’re quite welcome. I’m very happy you found it helpful. Best of luck to you, my friend.

Mike 🙂

What advice do have for an extreme right-brained thinker that needs to accelerate their left-brain thinking skills?

Dear Roxana,

That’s a great question. What the right-brain person typically needs is practice with precise organization and rigorous detail-management. Imagine if you had a large pile of all different kinds of paperclips, and you sat down and meticulously sorted them by type. Now, don’t gratuitously mix up paperclips, but if there’s any “mess” like that — a bunch of things in some drawer or closet all jumbled together, so them out in the most logical pattern possible. Organize any papers lining around — make yourself file them away in a rigid organizational scheme. For GRE Quant, practice, practice, practice. When you get a problem incorrect, it’s not enough to glance at the solutions and say, “Oh yeah, I get what I should have done.” No, force yourself be as meticulous as possible: write out a complete correct solution, from start to finish, including detailed explanations of the mistakes you made and how to avoid them in the future. Follow rigid procedures: for example, see this GMAT problem:

http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-ir-numerical-algorithm-flowchart-problems/

—- I know all this will seem like torture at first, but it’s precisely that unsparing focus on precision, detail, and organization that will build up the left-brain.

Good luck, my friend.

Mike 🙂

That’s a really interesting answer, Mike. I find it necessary to organize the spaces I frequent before I can even sit down and study anything in the math world. I literally have to go through a process, including what you just described as “unsparing focus on precision” through note taking. Thanks for sharing.

Dan,

You are quite welcome. 🙂 I am glad this resonated for you. Best of luck to you!

Mike 🙂

Mike

Wonderful question & thanks !!

My 2 cents worth thoughts.

(A) Priority to second method

When I first looked at it, i wanted to guess an answer. Naturally I thought half the area of the full square. Then I ended up with the triange counting.

Hence I guess in GRE they might shave off 1 triange or add one more to skew it off. And in such cases re arranging might not be optimal.

So triangle counting method is the best approach.

(B) Maximize addendum

Looking again after doing the triangle counting, I thought we can still reduce counting by looking for larger objects. So I could make a square ( 6 x 6) using 2 different triangles.

Then counted the remaining triangle.

Reduced counting VS additional operation to add 2 numbers !

Dear Sivabalan:

When using an insight-based solution, the best method is the one that you “see” first. It’s great that you shared a few alternatives here that might inspire other people. It’s helpful to get as many perspectives as possible, so that folks might use one of those perspectives on a problem on test day. On the real test, don’t spend a whole lot of time worrying about which insight is better — take one and run with it.

Does that make sense?

Mike 🙂

Absolutely! Thanks Mike!

You are welcome. I’m glad you find this helpful.

Mike 🙂

It is both helpul and stimulating.

Thanks:)

You are quite welcome.

Mike 🙂

Hi Mike,

Thanks for this enticing post (could easily been an article in a leading daily !). Do you think doing yoga or listening to classical music (Beethoven, Wagner et al ) could boost your right brain? I read that somewhere so was just curious.

Anupam

Anupam: Good questions. I believe Yoga does help you build some interhemispheric interconnection, especially if you practice the mirror image of asymmetrical poses. I don’t know what the cognitive effects would be on performance. —– I’m a huge fan of classical music, but I think its effect on you depends on *how* you listen. If it’s a nice tune in the background, I don’t think it will help much, but if you are actively identifying patterns in the music (inversion, modulation, development, sonata form, etc.) then I think it could help a bit.

Mike 🙂

Awesome article! Thanks! I am amazed with Magoosh! Wish I had found it earlier in my studies.

I’m glad you found it helpful.Thank you.

Mike 🙂

Since we have 16 equilateral triangles with side length 3. Then the area of all the 16 triangles –

(16 * root 3 * 9 )/ 4 = 36* root 3 .. right ?

Or Am I am missing something ?

Thanks

Dear Mezbah

These triangles are not equilateral — they have a right angle, but all three angles in an equilateral triangle are 60 degrees angles. The right angle automatically means it’s not equilateral.

That triangle is an isosceles right triangle, also known as a 45-45-90 triangle. See this GMAT blog for more about this kind of triangle:

http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/the-gmats-favorite-triangles/

Does this make sense?

Mike 🙂

Thank you so much Mike.

Yes, the question says Vertical of Horizontal distance is 3 units, not diagonally. Plus it has one right angle in each triangle.

Therefore area of 16 triangles are 16*1/2*9 = 72.

Thanks again

You are quite welcome.

Mike 🙂