For many students, the addition of the GRE’s onscreen calculator to the revised exam is a godsend. These students take solace in the notion that this new calculator will help them solve tons of questions. The truth of the matter is that almost all math questions on the revised GRE can be solved without a calculator. Furthermore, in many cases, it will actually take long to solve a question using a calculator that it will to use other techniques. Finally, the test-makers are taking questions that can be easily solved with a calculator and changing the numbers in order to render the calculator useless.

For example, a former GRE question would have asked you to evaluate – . The slow solution was to perform the actual (tedious) calculations. The fast solution was to recognize that this difference of squares can be factored as , which equals , which equals .

Since this question would be too easy to solve using the onscreen calculator, the test-makers will change the question to where and have too many digits for the calculator to handle. As such, you’ll have to solve this question using factoring techniques.

Aside: the onscreen calculator displays up to eight digits. If a computation results in a number greater than then an ERROR message is displayed. When you evaluate you get a 9-digit number.

Now, despite the test-makers’ attempts to remove the calculator from your arsenal, there **are** times when you can make a few adjustments to a question and then quickly answer it with the calculator.

Now, in my last post, we solved the following question using a variety of techniques and strategies:

Column A | Column B |
---|---|

- The quantity in Column A is greater
- The quantity in Column B is greater
- The two quantities are equal
- The relationship cannot be determined from the information given

Notice that these numbers yield products that are too big for the calculator to handle. However, with a few adjustments we can use a new strategy with the calculator to answer the question.

One solution is to first divide each column by 1,000,000. When we do this, we get:

Column A | Column B |
---|---|

From here, we can rewrite this as:

Column A | Column B |
---|---|

And this is the same as:

Column A | Column B |
---|---|

At this point, we can use the calculator enter all of these values, and each resulting product will have fewer than 8 digits.

So, with a small modification, we can answer this question using a calculator.

Now, can you think of another approach that allows you to use a calculator to solve the original question (without dividing by 1,000,000 or any other powers of 10)?

Here’s the original question:

Column A | Column B |
---|---|

Another approach is to first divide both sides by 641,713 to get:

Column A | Column B |
---|---|

Then, divide both sides by 897,189 to get:

Column A | Column B |
---|---|

At this point, we can enter all of these values into the calculator and compare the columns.

Next, we’ll examine another strategy to thwart the revised GRE and use the onscreen calculator to solve questions that, at first glance, appear to render the calculator useless:

The square root of 2 billion is between

- 2,000 and 5,000
- 5,000 and 15,000
- 15,000 and 30,000
- 30,000 and 50,000
- 50,000 and 90,000

Try to identify at least two ways to solve the above question.

Aside: Please notice that 2 billion is too large to fit in the onscreen calculator.

** **

## Non-calculator strategy:

This approach uses the following rule:

First we need to recognize that:

From here, we can see that since and then must lie between 4 and 5. In other words, we can say that equals 4.something.

If equals 4.something, then must lie between 40,000 and 50,000.

As such the answer must be D.

## Calculator strategy:

With a slight modification, we can use the onscreen calculator to solve the question within seconds.

First recognize that:

From here we can use the calculator to evaluate both roots. When we do this, we get:

So, the answer must be D.

641713*451222 is greater here..please validate the answer

Yes, A is the correct answer 😀

You can see the original post with the answer here: https://magoosh.com/gre/2011/gre-quantitative-comparison-tip-5-estimation-with-a-twist/

For the first one, I prefer the solution given in the Magoosh videos: if I use a calculator, 64×45=2880. 90×32=2880. Since the actual numbers of A are a bit bigger, and the actual numbers of B are a bit smaller (rounded up), then A must be bigger. Simple, fast. 😉

This is one of the import skill to save critical time.

Thanks

Glad it was helpful! Anything that helps save time–without sacrificing accuracy–is a good thing 🙂

Hi Brent,

Your tips are really awesome and Magoosh is really doing a great job publishing excellent tips for the students to ace GRE.. Hats off Magoosh!!!

Regards,

Vanan.

Hello Sir,

thanks for the simple and useful tips! they make u think.. “that was so obvious y didn’t i think that at the first place! “.

Magoosh is the only site which offers so many articles with invaluable tips for free! Keep up the good work 🙂

cheers!

Hi Praveen,

Thanks for the feedback!

Cheers,

Brent