I’ve long groused about MGRE’s Text Completion and Sentence Equivalence Guide. Some words are far too obscure to show up on the current GRE, and many of the practice sentences are far too difficult to help those just starting out. In this recent edition MGRE has edited some sentences and removed a few difficult words (yay, no more myrmidons!). I commend them, given that every other GRE test prep book will remain unchanged — typos and all — until the polar ice caps completely melt, or the GRE changes.
Yet, in this edition MGRE does not go as far as they should. There still are obscure words — lucubrate (which is sprinkled throughout the book) and obtundity come to mind. Also tough vocabulary (though not necessarily obscure words) seems to attend every question as though the only thing the GRE tests is difficult vocabulary and not one’s ability to pick up on the general context of a sentence or paragraph, and pick amongst relatively easy words.
Most significantly, MGRE doesn’t replace questions with improved ones–questions that better reflect ETS Text Completions and Sentence Equivalence. Instead, MGRE gives us the same questions, albeit with more GRE-like language and less debatable distractors. (I spotted only one question that had been completely changed). Finally, the difficulty level of the questions and the problem sets is still far too difficult for even those at an intermediate level. The helpful strategies MGRE tries to instill would have been much better served by questions that are toned down in language and tough vocab. Likewise, an easy and medium problem set with questions that are actually easy and medium– so students can build up their skills — would have greatly improved this book.
That said, the sentences in this book will be good practice for those who are already high verbal scorers and want to improve their vocabulary, while tackling tough sentences. And for any who want to get a better feel of some of the academic language on the test, they could do far worse than trying to wrap their heads around the twisted syntax and orotund style found in many of the practice questions.
I should mention that there are some excellent questions in the mix, ones which are reflective of the GRE and will prepare you for the nuance found on the actual test. But there are also many so-so questions, a few of which are plagued by a surfeit of overly difficult words, instead of relatively familiar words in which the test-taker must pick up on a subtle distinction in meaning.
So if you are looking for a step-by-step process to become more adept at Text Completions and Sentence Completions with questions (and answer choices!) that are indicative of the real test, MGRE is not the best place to go. If you are already strong at verbal and want some extra practice–and won’t freak out over some of ridiculously difficult words–than you’ll get some mileage out of the MGRE book.