One way to do this problem is to divide each answer choice by 3 and see which one leaves a remainder. A far better approach, however, is to apply the following rule of divisibility for 3. If the sum of the digits of any number is a multiple of 3, then that digit is divisible by 3.

Let’s try to apply this rule below:

111: 1 + 1 + 1 = 3. Three is a multiple of three so 111 is divisible by three.

3,456: 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 18. Eighteen is a multiple of 3 so 3,456 is divisible by three.

2,789: 2 + 7 + 8 + 9 = 26. Twenty-six is NOT a multiple of three. Therefore, 2,789 is not divisible by three.

Now let’s return to the original question.

(A) 231: 2 + 3 + 1 = 6 (Multiple)

(B) 246: 2 + 4 + 6 = 12 (Multiple)

(C) 285: 2 + 8 + 5 = 15 (Multiple)

(D) 326: 3 + 2 + 6 = 11 (Not Multiple) Answer

(E) 411: 4 + 1 + 1 = 6 (Multiple)

The next important rule to know is the rule of divisibility by 4: If the last two digits of a number are a multiple of 4, then the number is divisible by 4.

724: the last two digits are 24. 24 is a multiple of 4. (Divisible)

470: 70 is not a multiple of 4 (70/4 = 17.5). (Not Divisible)

40,004: 04, or 4 is a multiple of 4 (Divisible)

Now let’s try the following problem in which you have to combine everything you learned today:

Which of the following integers is divisible by 12?

(A) 1,442

(B) 1,653

(C) 1,728

(D) 2,048

(E) 2,884

What, you gasp. Divisibility of 12.You never taught us that! Well, for a number to be divisible by 12, it has to be divisible by both 4 and 3, because 4 x 3 = 12.

(A) 1,442: 42 is not a multiple of 4.

(B) 1,653: 53 is not a multiple of 4 (though the sum of the digits is divisible by 3).

(C) 1,728: 28 is a multiple of 4; the sum of the digits, 18, is a multiple of 3.

(D) 2,048: sum of digits 14. Not a multiple of 3.

(E) 2,884 : sum of digits is 22. Not a multiple of 3.

By the way, students who use Magoosh GRE improve their scores by an average of 8 points on the new scale
(150 points on the old scale.) Click here to learn more.

We know the rule that if “x” is divisible by “y” and “y” is in turn divisible by “z” , than “x” will also be divisible by “z”. Using that rule, can we calculate the prime factors of 12 i.e 2x2x3 and see if any of the numbers mentioned above contain the same factors in their Prime Factorization.
If they do contain 2x2x3 hidden somewhere than they are divisible by 12.
Is this an authentic approach for GRE questions or just luck that all my answers have been correct up till now using this rule?

This is a great approach as well. All you have to do is divide by ‘2’ twice and then see if the remaining number is divisible by ‘3’. You are essentially doing the same thing as I did above, except for one extra step. It might take you a little longer, but you will get the same (correct) answer as if you were using the “12 rule.”

Actually, you don’t want to use to use 6 and 2 to test divisibility by 12, because the ‘2’ is redundant in the ‘6’ (3 x 2 = 6). To illustrate, 18 is divisible by 6 and 2, but it is not divisible by 12.

Magoosh blog comment policy: To create the best experience for our readers, we will only approve comments that are relevant to the article, general enough to be helpful to other students, concise, and well-written! 😄 Due to the high volume of comments across all of our blogs, we cannot promise that all comments will receive responses from our instructors.

We highly encourage students to help each other out and respond to other students' comments if you can!

If you are a Premium Magoosh student and would like more personalized service from our instructors, you can use the Help tab on the Magoosh dashboard. Thanks!

Hye Chris

We know the rule that if “x” is divisible by “y” and “y” is in turn divisible by “z” , than “x” will also be divisible by “z”. Using that rule, can we calculate the prime factors of 12 i.e 2x2x3 and see if any of the numbers mentioned above contain the same factors in their Prime Factorization.

If they do contain 2x2x3 hidden somewhere than they are divisible by 12.

Is this an authentic approach for GRE questions or just luck that all my answers have been correct up till now using this rule?

Hi Fatima,

This is a great approach as well. All you have to do is divide by ‘2’ twice and then see if the remaining number is divisible by ‘3’. You are essentially doing the same thing as I did above, except for one extra step. It might take you a little longer, but you will get the same (correct) answer as if you were using the “12 rule.”

Hope that helps!

for the last question, do the divisibility rules for 2 and 6 factor in as well? since 6 x 2= 12…

thanks!

Hi Christina,

Good question!

Actually, you don’t want to use to use 6 and 2 to test divisibility by 12, because the ‘2’ is redundant in the ‘6’ (3 x 2 = 6). To illustrate, 18 is divisible by 6 and 2, but it is not divisible by 12.

Hope that makes sense :).